Objective

Objective

adj., use comp. often

Morphology: objective, objective, objectively, objective; more objectively; nar. objectively

1. In philosophy objective they call that which exists outside of a person, regardless of his consciousness, will, desire.

Man cognizes not the objective world, but his own ideas about the objective world. | Nature obeys objective laws. | The cause of the conflict is often not an objective reality, but what is happening in people's heads. |

I am sure that the spiritual world exists objectively.

2. objective truth called the correct reflection in the mind of a person, in science, etc. of reality, the real world around us.

3. Talking about objective reasons, circumstances, etc., you mean really existing reasons, circumstances, etc., which you cannot change.

For a number of objective reasons, we are forced to refuse you. | I was absent from the meeting due to objective circumstances. | We must act on the basis of the objective state of affairs.

4. objective you name opinions, assessments, etc., which are not influenced by your personal feelings, your attitude to the subject under discussion.

I do not want your words to somehow affect my final and objective conclusion. | Criticism must always remain objective. | The conclusion of the commission was quite objective. | The author of the book adheres to objective views on what is happening. |

Judge something objectively.

5. objective you name something that is completely true, reflects what really happened once or is happening at the moment.

This book is an objective diary of revolutionary events. | The article is based on objective facts. | The study does not contain objective data. |

He reflected events objectively.

6. If you objective, which means that in your assessments, judgments, etc., you are not guided by your personal feelings and opinions, but proceed from the true essence, the cause of something.

You are not objective! | The judge must be objective in his judgments.

objectivity noun, and.

objectivity of judgments.

Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language Dmitriev. D.V. Dmitriev. 2003 .

Antonyms:

See what "objective" is in other dictionaries:

OBJECTIVE. A lot of abstract words that have entered general literary speech from the language of philosophy were introduced by Kant. Kant's teaching produced a profound revolution in philosophical terminology. No wonder, according to the review in Monthly Rewiew (1799), Kant's system ... ... History of words

- (new lat. objectivus). 1) subject. 2) relating to the subject of our observation. 3) dispassionate, alien to personal sympathies and views. Dictionary of foreign words included in the Russian language. Chudinov A.N., 1910. OBJECTIVE impartial; ... ... Dictionary of foreign words of the Russian language

See fair ... Dictionary of Russian synonyms and expressions similar in meaning. under. ed. N. Abramova, M.: Russian dictionaries, 1999. objective real, real; impartial, impartial, impartial, impartial; fair;… … Synonym dictionary

OBJECTIVE, objective, objective; objective, objective, objective (bookish). 1. Corresponding to the object, existing outside of us and independently of us; real. “... A revolution cannot be made, ... revolutions grow out of objectively (regardless of ... ... Explanatory Dictionary of Ushakov

Objective- Objective ♦ Objectif Anything that has more to do with an object than with a subject; everything that exists independently of any subject, or, with the intervention of the subject (for example, in narration or evaluation), everything that serves ... ... Philosophical Dictionary of Sponville

OBJECTIVE, oh, oh; vein, vna. 1. Existing outside of us as an object (in 1 meaning). Objective reality. Objective reality. 2. Associated with external conditions, independent of anyone. will, opportunity. Objective circumstances. ... ... Explanatory dictionary of Ozhegov

- (from lat. objecivus. subject) relating to an object; objective, material, real, factual, not only conceivable, independent and abstracted from the subject, from subjective opinion, from the nature and interests of the subject; having… … Philosophical Encyclopedia

1. OBJECTIVE see lens. 2. OBJECTIVE, oh, oh; vein, out, out. 1. Existing outside of consciousness and independently of it (opposite: subjective). Oh world. Oh oh reality. About the laws of development of nature, society. Nature obeys... ... encyclopedic Dictionary

objective- 1. Existing outside and independently of consciousness; inherent in the object itself or corresponding to it. 2. Corresponding to reality; unbiased, impartial. Dictionary of practical psychologist. Moscow: AST, Harvest. S. Yu. Golovin. 1998 ... Great Psychological Encyclopedia

objective- ▲ correct display, valid subjective objectivity. objective correctly, not distortedly reflecting reality. impartiality. unbiased (#observer). impartiality. impartiality. impartiality ... Ideographic Dictionary of the Russian Language

Books

• Settlement and credit relations in foreign economic activity: Textbook, Veshkin Yu.G. The objective process of globalization of the modern world economy requires the use of new tools of settlement and credit relations, therefore, the study of various aspects and forms of their…

1) phil. existing independently of consciousness; inherent in the object itself or corresponding to it; objective reality - matter, nature, everything that exists in reality, regardless of consciousness; objective truth is knowledge... Large dictionary of foreign words

​​​​​​​As an objective circumstance, responsibility is the duty of a person to do what is necessary and ensure the desired result, this or that retribution for not doing what is due. Responsibility is an objective burden.

Deeds must be done, dear things must be preserved. If you were entrusted with this and you took it upon yourself, now you have responsibility, an objective burden, an obligation to do, preserve, control and report: to give high-quality answers to questions about what you have been entrusted with. The answer can be deeds, money, or an explanation.

And sometimes life.

So, responsibility as an objective circumstance has two sides. First: responsibility as a duty of a person to perform this or that (organize the implementation), to ensure the desired result.

Household order: "You are responsible for groceries, you prepare breakfast, and you are responsible for what to keep the house in order." As a member of society, a person (each of us) has many different responsibilities: social responsibility, civic responsibility, personal responsibility (moral or financial), responsibility of an adult or family person, parental responsibility ... See →

Second: liability as material or legal Negative consequences for a violation by a person of certain requirements for him, this or that payment (retribution).

For this violation - administrative responsibility, for this - criminal responsibility. And for something - life ... See Responsibility for the consequences

Combines all these meanings - the need for this or that, to pay with deed (actions) or money.

Types of responsibility

Responsibility as an objective circumstance has different types, shapes and directions. The main questions are "to whom", "for what", "who" and "what" a person is responsible for. So inside social responsibility distinguish between civil, business, parental and other types of responsibility, including responsibility to oneself. By directions: responsibility for one's own actions or words, for what business or task, for oneself or for others, for what has already happened or for the future. Personal responsibility is close to the author's life position, but differs from group and shared responsibility. In form, responsibility is divided into moral, administrative, financial, property and criminal. See →

Responsible approach

Responsibility does not fall from the sky, especially since there are few people who like to take responsibility and, moreover, be responsible for mistakes and failures. Responsibility appears only when it is done, created, organized, when someone shows a responsible approach. A responsible approach is an approach in which it is known who is responsible (and this is a responsible person), it is known to whom he is responsible, with what and for what he is specifically responsible (pays). Cm.

"The current legislation provides that the court

when imposing punishment, it takes into account the nature and degree

public danger of the committed crime, personal

the nature of the perpetrator and the circumstances of the case, mitigating and aggravating

expecting responsibility.

In cases where the crime

committed in complicity, the court must also take into account

the degree and nature of the participation of each of the accomplices in the

shcha perfect crime. These General requirements behind-

horses provide a proper basis for the individualization of

knowledge assigned to each of their accomplices^

Together^^^m, current legislature does not contain

there are norms that would determine the influence of objective and

subjective circumstances related to one complicity

nikam, on the responsibility of others. In the theory of the Soviet

law and in practice, these issues are often resolved in different ways.

nomu. Therefore, their clarification is important.

A. A. Piontkovsky proceeds from the fact that the circumstances relating to the conditions for the commission of

perpetrator of a crime, making it more dangerous or

less dangerous, are subject to criminal liability

vein to all other accomplices, of course, with

provided that these circumstances were covered by their foreseeable

as elements of direct or eventual intent>

G. A. Krieger also considers imputation unacceptable

accomplices of aggravating circumstances relating to

identity of the performer, such as repetition, especially dangerous

ny recurrence.

Essentially, R.N. Su-

Dakova, who shares the view of those criminologists, exclude an unambiguous solution to the question of the limits of

catching-legal imputation to accomplices of signs, characteristic

terizing the personality of the performer, and, developing, clarifying

thought of A. A. Piontkovsky, differentiate the assessment of the indicated

given characteristics, taking into account not only their influence on the general

the danger of a jointly committed crime,

but also their significance in the structure of the crime>.

"MI Kovalev, standing on the positions of accessory co-

participation on the issue of the impact of objective and personal

the liability of some accomplices to the liability of others

proceeds from the fact that: a) accomplices are responsible

for a criminal act, so all the elements that characterize

elements of this act, can be imputed to any

mu accomplice, moreover, regardless of their nature; b) co-

participants can only be held responsible for the circumstances

evidence related to the composition of the act performed, but not

with the identity of the performer, so all objective aggravating

mitigating or mitigating circumstances

apply to all accomplices, and personal circumstances

statements should refer only to their carrier> )