The capturing


     Here I offer one short English language example of my theological
works. The Author is searching for possibility of MAKING THEM PUBLISHED
or simply personal communication. If anyone would express INTEREST OF
ANY KIND, please contact the Author on the following address: vvv

      , ,  9 - 57. tel: 54 - 45 - 31
      Alexander Golenkov, Kostroma, Titova 9 - 57, Russia 156023.
       --------------------------- + ----------------------------
                                   v
                                   I ask very much to treat this work of
                                   mine very carefully, as a way to the
                                   writing if it was very difficult, and
                                   can be continued only with someone`s
                                   help.
                                   +
    =   T H E   C A P T U R I N G   =
                              * ------- *
                                   +
NOTE FOR THE LANGUAGE APPLIED: This work of mine is BREAKING THE BEING
                               TO ITS VERY CORE, and - SO IS THE LANGUA-
                               GE, applied in it. It`s also "breaking
                               the words". There is no other way to de-
                               monstrate it most vividly. Practically,
                               it`s DIFFERENT LANGUAGE. Not "English";
                               not "Russian"; NOT HUMAN AT ALL. (See in
                               the Bible of "other tongues").
NOTE FOR THE TRANSLATION: Although, "PHYSICALLY" it had to be put into
          "shell" of certain national language, extracting the "MOST OF
          IT". For that matter, it is based in a very considerable ex-
          tent on PLAYING OF RUSSIAN WORDS (begining with the very word
          "Capturing", and so on).
If it were written originally in English, it would do so too; - and IN
SOME PLACES DOES - as you will see it below; - but basically, there were
only two ways to translate it in English: Either to use some "CONVENTIO-
NAL" English set of words, but to lose the exactness of the IDEA STAN-
DING BEGIND, or to express it rather UNCONVENTIONALLY, but AS THE IDEA
REQUIRES, passing it "ONE TO ONE" in a linguistic form. THE SECOND WAY
IS PREFERRED HERE. Although these words may sound rather "bizzar" to an
ordinary English speaker, one has to realise that, IN THE SENCE OF IDEA,
those are VERY CATEGORICALLY EXACT THEOLOGICAL TERMS.
            """""???? + ????"""""
                     ?----------------------------?
                    | Shortest layout of my work | 
                    |     = THE CAPTURING =      | 
                    |     ("")      | 
                     ?----------------------------?
     The "Capturing" is the NAME OF THE BEING (and not only the name of
this work of mine /the other ways for translating this Russian word are:
the "Breathtaking"; "Painstaking", "Exciting"; "CAPTURING THE ENTIRE AT-
TENTION"/).
          And really: The very first question put forward in the "Captu-
          ring" is: What does one need just to BE ?
The answer is:
   "?? 1.) SOMETHING OF HIS OWN KIND (in the BEING WHICH ALREADY
             EXISTS), the relation to which is CONFLUENT *1.
 (The most vivid example: The c o m i n g  i n t o  t h i s  b e i n g
 t h r u  t h e  c o n?f l u e n t  l i n e  o f  c o n?g e n e r i c
 s u c?c e s s i o n, - as ANY AT ALL CREATURE DOES /Spectacularilly,
 but the English word "KIND" is "OF ONE KIND" to "KIN", meaning a KIND
 OF CON?GENERIC COMMUNITY/).
   "?? 2.) SOMETHING OF DIFFERING KIND (in the "neighbouring" part of
             the Being), the relation to which is SEPARATE.
 (This lets, back again, us most vividly to explain that well-known
 phenomenon, that ANY CREATURE, (new?)BORN IN THIS WORLD, AT CERTAIN
 POINT IN TIME is LEAVING HIS MATERNAL HOME (or, anyway, "HABITAT"),
 aspiring for the meeting with SOMETHING THE DIFFERING, to - having
 COLLIDFED ONESELF WITH the Differing - AQUIRE ONE`S OWN FACE; - as a
 "STAMP FROM THE FACE OF THE BEING", for: In the minute details of this
 Collision are - literally - being "forged out" the TRAITS OF HIS  CARACTER [Latin word "natio" means, namely, "KIND"!], and
 what is called PERSONALITY (Russian word for "personality" is coming
 from one root with "FACE").
      || Just look: Every nation of this world had aquired its charac-
      || teristic national traits (its "SHAPES" and "FORMS") only as a
      || RESULT OF CERTAIN BATTLE in whih it had DIFFERED ITSELF ("SE-
      || PARATED") from all things around.
 And not only at the moment of that, but so ON: The peoples of this
 world are only searching pretexts for NEW COLLISIOUNS, for they need
 regullarily to "feed up" the entire of this "energetics of Being"
  ?-----------?  <"pay the tribute" to the DEMON OF WAR, the "King of
  |Little -?     this world", the "Master of Being"; - "in exchange"
  |English ?-?   for the "tribute" of which he is giving them their own
  |"playing  ?-? at?tributes>).
  |with words" ?------------------
               [By the margins like this "" are marked the "examples in
                brackets", illustrating the Two Statements given above.]

     And so: 2.) The STATE OF BEING SEPARATED and 1.) The STATE OF BEING
CONFLUENT are the two basic components of Being. Everythihg else is, in
final analisys, coming down to them, and is nothing more as only THEIR
COMBINATION. Correspondingly, the SUCCES IN SUCH BEING is belonging to
those who KNOW THE ART OF COMBINING THE TWO, or, in other words, -
translating it all to the language of the above-mentioned Two Principles
"SEPARATED" and "CONFLUENT", -
   ?----------------------------------------------------------------?
   | 2.) Who "knows how" IN TIME TO SHOW ONE`S JAWS TO THE OTHER; ?-?-?
   | 1.) Who "knows how" IN TIME to inter?COUPLE THE OTHER. ?-------?-
   ?---------------------------------------------------------------- |
??--------------------------------------------------------------------?
??-? THE MOST VIVID SYMBOL OF "SEPARATION";
 ?-? THE MOST VIVID SYMBOL OF GETTING INTO THE "CONFLUENT JUNCTION"; -
of which the above-mentioned "kin" is continued; although we are meaning
MORAL CON?JUNCTION RATHER THAN PHYSICAL  any other)/; - everything finally is coming to that, - as it is
IN THE WORLD OF THE BEASTS - for, such is the IMAGE OF THE BEAST.
     And THERE IS NOTHING IN IT EXCEPT THAT (these Two Points). THERE IS
NOTHING ELSE IN THE BEING which is built accorting to the outlined here
IMAGE OF THE BEAST: When THESE TWO PASSIONS are R E A L L Y
C A P T U T I N G  (from where the NAME OF MY PRESENT WORK REALLY CO-
MES), absorbing ENTIRE ATTENTION (so that such kind of "beast" SEES NOT-
HING ELSE).
   "?? 3.) But let`s nonetheless ask ourselves: Is there anything else
   "??     in the being, which would be also WORTHY OF HUMAN BEING?!
"The Capturing" calls it: The "U`n`c`o`n`c`e`i`v`a`b`l`e".
          And if in the Capturing (or, in other words, SUCH KIND OF BE-
          ING, THE PASSIONS OF WHICH ARE TRYING TO "CAPTURE") all things
          are EITHER "CONFLUENT", or "SEPARATE", in the Unconceivable -
          UNSEPARABLE and UNCONFLUENT.
And THIS IS THE MAJOR STATEMENT OF MY WORK "THE CAPTURING" (Nomber 3),
and the MAJOR DISCOVERY I MADE IN MY LIFE:
          If in godless world all things are interrelated only according
          to principle "Confluent and Separate", IN THE WORLD, HAVING
          AT LEAST SOME RELATION to the above-it Unconceivable - they
          are starting to change it to "UNSEPARABLE and UNCONFLUENT".
                  - And this way the Unconceivable can be conceived.
The words which we now say are not "simple words", but they are already
relating now to the Word, of Whom sais the Bible, for we now have ente-
red already (from that "demonic sphere" of which we have started) PURE
CHRISTIANITY. "You are to conceive a Child" - sais the Word of the Word.
Thus Unconceivable of the God is getting conceivable, thru Jesus Christ.
     And that`s not all.
     As the Christian Church started to reflect (namely - trying to con-
ceive -), how the NATURE OF HUMAN and the NATURE OF GOD were joined in
Jesus Christ, it came to the conclusion: "UNSEPARABLY and UNCONFLUENT-
LY"!; - what is representing a MAJOR CHRISTIAN DOGMAT (so that any devi-
ation from it is even called: HERESY, i.e., a "thing of this world",
reflecting the IMAGE OF THE BEAST, and not the Image of God).
          It greatly influences the behaviour, coming out from these two
          images (so, "heresy" - is not a "theoretical" thing; but is as
          practical, as hardly anything else). For:
If Human and God (Creator and the Creation) are really joined in Jesus
Christ namely that way, it really opens way for joining everything else
in the world according such Image (with one another thru God: for, rela-
tion between the creation and God thru Jesus Christ is only "UNSEPARABLE
and UNCONFLUENT" - AS IS in Jesus Christ) Such is the creative and mo-
ral message of my work "The Capturing" (the concrete examples are follo-
wed in its full Russian text).
                              * ------- *
                                   +
     This principle - "UNSEPARABLE and UNCONFLUENT" - which in "The Cap-
turing" is led out purely logically (see for that full Russian text of
"The Capturing") - had coinsided completely with the same-name Dogmatics
of Orthodox Christianity (usually ACCEPTED BY FAITH). Taking a new star-
ting poing of SUCH AN INSPIRING COINSIDENCE, it later continues its line
by alleging that:
  ?-----? 2.) Only God the Creator is QUITE POWERFULY of the "DIFFERING
  |      KIND" to Creation (see point 2);
?-?-----? 1.) Only He quite powerfully can give the "SAME KIND" to it.
| |      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| ?--? For, He is Creator, and in any respect "NOT THE CREATION" (DIFFE-
| RENT, i.e., to it); not even anything in creation (for, "anything in
| creation" is NOTHING BUT IDLE).
?----? For, He is - CREATOR, and namely - CREATES all such kind to what
is ALLREADY CREATED! He is really that "HEAVENLY FATHER", Whom calls
Him the Scripture. (For those who were born "Not of the flesh; not of
the lust of this world").
     In Scripture it`s very vividly told of the "best Doctor": THE ONE
WHO CREATED THE THINGS KNOWS BEST HOW TO CURE THEM. For, the creation
has fallen away from the Creator. What does it really mean? - It had
"enclosed itself" - having itself deprived of THESE TWO COMPONENTS OF
THE BEING. What`s then? - It had started trying to "extract them from
itself".
          There is popular Russian folk tale of how the fox, having fo-
          und himvself with some other beasts in a trap (- and the
          "TRAP" is an IMAGE OF HELL, to which this self-enclosed world
          is gradually coming -) had teached other beasts to "eat their
          bowels" (and after they were killing themselves by tearing
          their owm bellies - EATING THEM ONE AFTER OTHER).
Isn`t it a clearest image of what devil "teaches" humanity?! For, -
what really else remains in the world of creation which had "closed" it-
self from the Creator? -
         2.) "EATING" and tearing itself into pieces, from one hand
          (look at the MAP OF THE WORLD: the VIVID EXAMPLE!), causing
          itself deep teared wounds. While, from the other hand:
         1.) Ones of creation are filled with a LUSTING DESIRE FOR OT-
          HERS! (As one flesh of creation is eating the other ).
Such is (the later two points) a sort of a "contradiction inside", which
moves the "creation without the Creator"! The Devil from here can clear-
ly be seen as "MASTER" of such kind of being. (It was not "in vain" when
here above we called him a "Master"!). For, - it is only by
i n?t r i c a t e  d e v i l`s  i n?t r u g u e  t h e  w o r l d
e x?t r i c a t e s for itself this "fuel for being", - even being dep-
tived the TRUE SOURCE OF IT.
     But together with all that it`s clear that this only temporary. Ru-
led by the Devil creation simply can not go on so "endlessly", for is
very obvious soon end for this kind of "fuel". The question arises:
What`s then? - And so we are getting in its paramount exactness the
category of hell:
         2.) There`ll be nothing else to "devide", - as everything will
          be allready devided, and turned into those DEAPTHLESS WOUNDS,
          of which testimoies the Scripture (WOUND UPON WOUND!).
         1.) There will remain nothing else to "confluently join", for
          ALL POSSIBILITIES FOR THAT IN THE WORLD WILL BE EXHAUSTED
One will be having to lustfully "join with himself" - having already TI-
RED OF HIMSELF (EXHAUSTED HIMSELF) to the outermost limit.
     It will happen to those who LOVED ONLY THEMSELVES in this world
(And did all to "join more and more" to oneself). And really, let`s lo-
ok into the writing of the Apostle (of ancient Romans): "Their men, ha-
ving tired of natural use of their women, are burning themselves with
passions to each other" This is REAL START OF THE HELL; the FIRE OF IT,
already BURNING IN THEIR SOULS
          The image of "demom, rashing in rage on a frying-pan" has not-
          hing to do with "popular imagination", but quite CATEGORICALLY
          EXACT image of hell, according to the logic of "The Captu-
          ring"!!!
This is the FINAL END of all those "Separations" and "Confluent Junctu-
res" in the sphere of this world.
     While the outlined Christian principle of "UNSEPARABLE and UNCONF-
LUENT" is truly presenting itself as a CURE FOR THE WORLD.
                              * ------- *
     It has MANY PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS - but it is outlined already in
my other works. While here it were only the INTRODUCTORY NOTES for my
general ALL-EMBRACING ETHICAL AND ESTETHICAL WORLD OUTLOOK SYSTEM, exp-
ressing the Christian attitude to all spheres of personal, social life
and economy (the attitude to "Earth`s bowels" we have already mentioned
above).
    ?---------------------------------------------------------------?
   ?The Capturing - as the PASSIONATE BEING - is entering struggle  |
    | with the Unconceivable - the BEING NOT OF THIS WORLD - trying |
    | to capture it; - unless it conceives Unconceivable           |
    ?---------------------------------------------------------------?
Such is the SHORTEST PORTRAIT OF "THE CAPTURING".

            """""???? + ????"""""

     Here I`ve given one short English language example of my theologi-
cal works. The Author is searching for possibility of MAKING THEM PUB-
LISHED or simply personal communication. If anyone would express INTE-
REST OF ANY KIND, please contact the Author on the following address:

       , ,  9 - 57. tel: 54 - 45 - 31
       Alexander Golenkov, Kostroma, Titova 9 - 57, Russia 156023.
     Excuse me for not corrected errors and "rough places" of spe-
     ach. That`s all I had time to translate untill now (later the
     narrative line of "the Capturing" is much more breathtaking!).

            """""???? + ????"""""

                       PLEASE, CONTACT THE AUTHOR



Russian original version:

    , , 156023,  9 - 57, tel: 54-45-31
   ------------------------------- + --------------------------------

I have a greatest discovery made in my life
         [See English version of this work of mine in the Capture ]
     .   " " -
     ;       , -
   , -   .   -  
  ("").

                 ""

     "" -   (       -
).
       || :  ,    "-
       || ", -     ,  ?
   "?? 1.) -, - " "  ( ) ,
                .
 ( :      
  )
   "?? 2.) -  - "",    .
 ( ,  :       -
    ,    "",  -
    -    ;   -
        
 ?. :      -
     - ,     -
   ?  . ,    ;
        , 
 ""   " ")
  , ""  ""   , 
   .      , 
     ,    -
 ,      帅,  - 
      ""  "":
             ?--------------------------------------------?
             | 1.)      ; |
             | 2.)      .  |
             ?--------------------------------------------?
    ;      ,  
 -     -  . (  
     : ҅,    
    - Ņ).
    "?? 3.) ,  ,  :    -
    "??      ,    ?!
 ""     :  ("YES"), 
  <>: ```````````.
              (..,  ,  
            )   "  ",  
           -  :   .
 -       "".
      : "  ",    -
  ,       -
        
  (  )   .
             ,
     , :
         1.)         (,
            - ,   Ѩ    );
         2.)       " "; -  
           .
       "- " (..,  " ") 
  ,    -    ,  Ѩ
Ψ          
  ,     (   -
 ,          "
",   -    ). ,    
, " "  -  (    ).   -
      ˅
             
 ; -    ?    "-
"  -   ,      
  ( ,  ""      ,
,  ,  " ").
        ,    "",  - -
  ""    ; -     
:  "",   ""   -
,         " " 
    - ΅     
     "" , ,   , -
    ! (, "" - -  -
 ).       "",    -
       (,     "-
" ,  ,   ,  ).   -
  ,    .    , 
()  .       . -?
?---------------------------------------------------------------------?
|      ||     "",   ,
|      || ,   , Ѩ      
|      || ("")
| - , ,      ,  -
|     "  ";
|      ||      -        -
|      ||  ߅
| (, ,  -   "",   -
|         "",  
|  Ņ).
|      ||       : !!! - 
|      ||    .  (, ) ,  
|      ||  ""  ,     -
|      ||   , "   "
| (, " ",  "- ",  "-
| -"     "  ").
|      || , ,        -
|      || - ""  -   ("-
|      || ").  -    ,   
|      || ,     ""  ,  "
|      || "  ,     " -
|      || "
|    "- "    "-
| ".  "׸,   " -    ,
|  " "     ; - "-
|   " (   ) -    
|     ,  " " -
|   "" -   ""    - 
| ""    " ",  -   "-
| " -   ,   
|      ||  ,      ,  
|      ||   
?-->   ""       -
 ,      .  ,
"" -  : "   ", 
    "  " ("-
", "");  - -
 .
  ?------------------------------------------------------------------?
>  [..,  ]   [ "  |
  |  "]      ,    :   |
  |    ,   Ņ< <
  ?------------------------------------------------------------------?
, ,  "".

    , , 156023,  9 - 57, tel: 54-45-31




"The capturing "