Ultrasonic inspection of pipes. Method for manufacturing segment reflectors

INDUSTRY STANDARD

NON-DESTRUCTIVE CONTROL.

WELDED PIPELINE JOINTS

Ultrasound method

OST 36-75-83

INDUSTRY STANDARD

By order of the Ministry of Installation and Special construction work USSR dated February 22, 1983 No. 57, the introduction date has been established

This standard applies to butt ring welded joints of process pipelines at a pressure of no more than 10 MPa (100 kgf/cm 2), with a diameter of 200 mm or more and a wall thickness of 6 mm or more from low-carbon and low-alloy steels, made by all types of fusion welding and establishes requirements for non-destructive testing using ultrasonic methods. The standard was developed taking into account the requirements of GOST 14782-76, GOST 20415-75, as well as the recommendations of CMEA PC 4099-73 and PC 5246-75. The need to use an ultrasonic control method, its volume and quality requirements for welded joints are established by regulations -technical documentation to pipelines. APPROVED AND ENTERED INTO EFFECT BY ORDER OF THE Ministry of Installation and Special Construction Works of the USSR dated February 22, 1983 No. 57 EXECUTORS: VNIImontazhspetsstroy Popov Yu.V., Ph.D. tech. Sciences (topic leader), Grigoriev V.M., Art. n. With. (responsible executive), Kornienko A. M., art. engineer (executor) CO-PERFORMERS: UkrPTKImontazhspetsstroy Tsechal V.A., head of the basic welding laboratory (responsible executor) VNIKTIstalkonstruktsiya (Chelyabinsk branch) Vlasov L.A., head. sector (responsible executor), Neustroeva N.S., art. engineer (executor) Central Welding Laboratory of the Trust "Belpromnaladka" Vorontsov V.P., group leader (executor in charge) AGREED BY: Ministry of Food Industry of the USSR A.G. Ageev Ministry of Health of the RSFSR R.I. Khalitov Ministry of Installation and Special Construction Works of the USSR Soyuzstalkonstruktsiya V.M. Vorobyov V/O "Soyuzspetslegkonstruktsiya" A.N. Secrets of Glavstalkonstruktsiya B. C. Konopatov Glavmetallurgmontazh F.B. Trubetskoy Glavkhimmontazh V.Ya. Kurdyumov Glavneftemontazh K.I. Persecutor Glavtekhmontazh D.S. Korelin Glavlegprodmontazh A.Z. Medvedev Main Technical Directorate G.A. Sukalsky Deputy Director of the Institute for scientific work, Ph.D. Yu.V. Sokolov I.o. head Department of Standardization, Ph.D. V.A. Karasik Topic leader, head. laboratory, Ph.D. Yu. B. Popov Responsible executor, Art. Researcher, acting head sector V.M. Grigoriev Performer, Art. engineer A.M. Kornienko CO-PERFORMERS: Director of the Institute UkrPTKIMontazhspetsstroy V.F. Nazarenko Head of the Welding and Pipelines Department N.V. Vygovsky Chief designer of the project G.D. Shkuratovsky Responsible executive, head of the basic welding laboratory V.A. Tsechal Director of the Institute VNIKTIstalkonstruktsiya (Chelyabinsk branch) M.F. Chernyshev Executive Officer, Head. sector of L.A. Vlasov Head of the central laboratory of the Belpromnaladka trust L.S. Denisov Responsible executive, group leader V.P. Vorontsov

1. PURPOSE OF THE METHOD

1.1. Ultrasonic testing designed to identify welds and the heat-affected zone of cracks, lack of penetration, lack of fusion, pores, slag inclusions and other types of defects without deciphering their nature, but indicating the coordinates, conditional dimensions and number of detected defects. 1.2. Ultrasonic testing is carried out at ambient temperatures from +5°C to +40°C. In cases where the controlled product is heated in the area of ​​the searcher's movement to temperatures from +5°C to +40°C, testing is permitted at ambient temperatures down to minus 10°C. In this case, flaw detectors and finders must be used that remain operational (according to the passport data) at temperatures from minus 10°C and below. 1.3. Ultrasonic testing is carried out at any spatial position of the welded joint.

2. REQUIREMENTS FOR DEFECTOSCOPISTS AND ULTRASONIC INSPECTION SITE

2.1. Requirements for flaw detectors for ultrasonic testing. 2.1.1. Ultrasonic testing should be carried out by a team of two flaw detectors. 2.1.2. Persons who have undergone theoretical and practical training in special courses (at a training center) in accordance with the program approved by in the prescribed manner who have a certificate for the right to conduct inspection and issue an opinion on the quality of welds based on the results of ultrasonic testing. Flaw detectorists must undergo recertification at least once a year, as well as during a break in work for more than 6 months and before being allowed to work after a temporary suspension for poor quality of work. To carry out recertification at the place of work, the following composition of the certification commission is recommended: the chief welder of the trust, the head of the welding laboratory of the trust, the head of training courses, the group leader or senior engineer for ultrasonic flaw detection, and a safety engineer. The results of recertification are documented in protocols and recorded in the certificate of the flaw detector. 2.1.3. Ultrasonic testing work must be supervised by technical engineers or flaw detectors of at least category 5, with at least three years of experience in this specialty. 2.2. Requirements for the ultrasonic testing area of ​​a welding laboratory. 2.2.1. The ultrasonic testing area must have production areas that provide workplaces for flaw detectors, equipment and accessories. 2.2.2. At the ultrasonic testing site the following are placed: ultrasonic flaw detectors with a set of standard finders; distribution board from an alternating current network with a frequency of 50 Hz, voltage 220 V ± 10%, 36 V ± 10%, portable blocks mains power, grounding buses; standard and test samples, auxiliary devices for checking and adjusting flaw detectors with finders; sets of plumbing, electrical and measuring tools, accessories (chalk, colored pencils, paper, paints); contact fluid, oiler, cleaning material, seam brush; work tables and workbenches; racks and cabinets for storing flaw detectors with a set of finders, samples, materials and documentation.

3. SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

3.1. When working with ultrasonic flaw detectors, it is necessary to comply with safety and industrial sanitation requirements in accordance with GOST 12.2.007.0-75; SNiP III-4-80, “Rules for the technical operation of electrical installations of consumers and safety rules for the operation of electrical installations of consumers,” approved by the State Energy Supervision Authority of the USSR on April 12, 1969, with additions and amendments, and “Sanitary standards and rules for working with equipment that creates ultrasound, transmitted by contact into the hands of workers No. 2282-80", approved by the USSR Ministry of Health. 3.2. When powered from an alternating current network, ultrasonic flaw detectors must be grounded with a copper wire with a cross-section of at least 2.5 mm 2. 3.3. Connection of flaw detectors to the alternating current network is carried out through sockets installed by an electrician at specially equipped posts. 3.4. Flaw detectorists are prohibited from opening the flaw detector connected to the power source and repairing it, due to the presence of a high voltage unit. 3.5. It is prohibited to carry out inspections near places where welding work is performed without fencing with light-protective screens. 3.6. It is prohibited to use oil as a contact liquid when carrying out ultrasonic testing near oxygen cutting and welding sites, as well as in rooms for storing oxygen cylinders. 3.7. When carrying out work at heights, in cramped conditions, workplaces must provide the flaw detector with convenient access to the welded joint, subject to safety conditions (construction of scaffolding, scaffolding, use of helmets, mounting belts, special clothing). It is prohibited to carry out inspections without protective devices against the effects of atmospheric precipitation on the flaw detector, equipment and inspection location. 3.8. Flaw detectors must undergo medical examinations at least once a year in accordance with the order of the USSR Ministry of Health No. 400 of May 30, 1969 and “Therapeutic and preventive measures to improve the health and working conditions of ultrasonic testing operators,” approved by the USSR Ministry of Health on March 15 1976 3.9. Persons at least 18 years of age who have undergone safety training and are registered in a logbook are allowed to work on ultrasonic flaw detection. in the prescribed form. Instructions must be carried out periodically within the time limits established by the order of the organization (trust, installation department, plant). 3.10. The administration of the organization conducting ultrasonic testing is obliged to ensure compliance with safety requirements. 3.11. If safety rules are violated, the flaw detector operator must be removed from work and re-admitted to it after additional instructions.

4. REQUIREMENTS FOR EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS

4.1. For inspection, it is recommended to use ultrasonic pulse flaw detectors UDM-1M and UDM-3, produced no earlier than 1975, DUK-66P (DUK-66PM), UD-10P, UD-10UA, UD-24, a specialized set "ECHO" ("ECHO -2") or other flaw detectors that meet the requirements of GOST 14782-76. Basic specifications flaw detectors are given in reference Appendix 1. 4.2. To carry out quality control of welds in hard-to-reach places (in cramped spaces, at heights) on construction or installation sites, it is recommended to use lightweight, small-sized flaw detectors: the ECHO set (ECHO-2) or other similar devices. 4.3. Flaw detectors must be equipped with standard or special inclined finders with prism angles for plexiglass of 30°, 40°, 50°, 53°, 54° (55°) at frequencies of 1.25 (1.8); 2.5; 5.0 MHz and direct seekers at frequencies of 2.5 and 5.0 MHz. It is allowed to use other types of finders with prisms made of other materials. In this case, the angles of the finder prisms are chosen such that the corresponding input angles are equal to the input angles of the finders with plexiglass prisms. 4.4. To check the main parameters of flaw detectors and finders, as well as control parameters, the equipment set must include standard samples No. 1, 2, 3 - in accordance with GOST 14782-76 or a set of control samples and auxiliary devices (KOU-2) in accordance with TU 25- 06.1847-78. In addition, test samples with artificial reflectors must be made to adjust flaw detectors. 4.5. To assess the performance of flaw detectors and finders in the ultrasonic testing area, their main parameters should be periodically checked for compliance with the passport data, which is recorded in the documentation for the device. Newly obtained flaw detectors and finders whose parameters have not been verified are not allowed to be used for inspection. 4.6. Conditional sensitivity, depth gauge error and sweep linearity, if the coordinates are determined using the CRT screen scale, are checked to ensure that their values ​​correspond to the passport data at least twice a year. 4.7. The conditional sensitivity and error of the depth gauge are checked using standard samples No. 1, 2 (Fig. 1, 3). The linearity of the scan is checked according to the method outlined in recommended Appendix 2. 4.8. In finders, at least once a week, check the correspondence of the mark on the side surface of the prism to the exit point “O” of the ultrasonic beam according to standard sample No. 3 (Fig. 2), and the angle of the prism according to standard sample No. 1 (Fig. 1). 4.9. Flaw detectors are considered suitable for operation if the values ​​of the tested parameters (clause 4.6.) correspond to the values ​​specified in the device passport. 4.10. Finders should be considered suitable for work if the values ​​of the tested parameters (clause 4.8.) do not exceed the permissible deviation values ​​specified in section 1 of GOST 14782-76. 4.11. Flaw detectors and finders for which the results of checking the parameter values ​​turned out to be unsatisfactory must be repaired or replaced with new ones. Repair of flaw detectors, with the exception of malfunctions specified in the operating instructions for the device, must be carried out by specialists from the manufacturer or in specialized workshops.

Standard sample No. 3


1 - maximum amplitude of the reflected signal; 2 - exit point of the ultrasonic beam; n - finder's arrow

Standard sample No. 2

1 - scale; 2 - block of steel grade 20 GOST 1050-74 in a normalized state with a grain size of 7 points or more according to GOST 5839-65; 3 - screw; 4 - hole for determining the angle of beam entry; 5 - hole for checking dead zone.

5. PREPARATION FOR CONTROL

5.1. The basis for carrying out initial inspection, as well as repeated inspection after eliminating defects in the weld, is an application signed by the customer. The application, the form of which is given in recommended Appendix 3, is registered in the welding laboratory in a journal (recommended Appendix 4). 5.2. Only welded joints accepted based on the results of external inspection and meeting the requirements of GOST 16037-80 are subject to control. 5.3. It is prohibited to inspect welded joints of pipelines filled with liquid. 5.4. Workstations for performing ultrasonic testing must be prepared in advance. To work in hard-to-reach places and at heights, support personnel must be allocated to help flaw detectors. 5.5. Selecting the sounding method, type of finder, contact fluid, control circuit. 5.5.1. Depending on the thickness of the elements being welded (GOST 16037-80), a sounding method is chosen that allows for control of the cross-section of the entire deposited metal (Table 1). 5.5.2. Distance B, to which the surface of the movement zone of the IC type finder must be prepared on both sides of the weld reinforcement bead, is selected according to table. 1 or in cases of using other types of finders is calculated using the formulas:

B 1 = d × tan a -l/2+d+m (1)

When sounded directly

B 2 =2 d × tan a +d+m (2)

When sounded by a direct and once reflected beam

B 3 =3 d × tan a -l/2+d+m (3)

When sounded by a once and twice reflected beam

Table 1

Ultrasonic testing parameters

Thickness of welded elements according to GOST 16037-80, mm

Sounding method*)

Finder prism angle, degrees.

Finder operating frequency, MHz

Finder movement area, mm

Stripping zone B**, mm

Limit sensitivity S p (first rejection level), mm 2

Area and linear dimensions of the vertical face of the corner reflector

area S mm 2

width b mm

height h mm

from 6 to 7.5 incl.

Direct and once reflected beam

over 7.5 to 10 incl.

Notes: *) If it is impossible to sound the entire cross-section of the seam with direct and single-reflected beams, sounding with single- and double-reflected beams is allowed. **) When sounding seams with a doubly reflected beam, the stripping zone B is calculated using formula (3) clause 5.5.2
A diagram explaining the indicated formulas for determining the stripping zone is shown in Fig. 4. 5.5.3. Surfaces at a distance B on both sides of the seam reinforcement must be cleaned of metal splashes, flaking scale, rust, dirt and paint. Cleaned surfaces should be free of dents, irregularities and nicks. A highly correlated surface (corrosion depth greater than 1 mm) must be machined until a flat and smooth surface is obtained. For cleaning, it is recommended to use metal brushes, chisels and grinders with an abrasive wheel. After mechanical treatment of the surface, its roughness should be no more than R z = 40 microns according to GOST 2789-73. 5.5.4. Cleaning the surface and removing contact liquid after testing is not the responsibility of the flaw detector. 5.5.5. After cleaning, the welded joint is marked into sections and numbered so that the location of the defect can be unambiguously determined along the length of the seam according to the diagram shown in Fig. 5 . 5.5.6. To create acoustic contact use transformer oil according to GOST 982-80, glycerin - according to GOST 6259-75, liquids developed by the Taganrog plant "Krasny Kotelshchik" and the Chernivtsi Machine-Building Plant (recommended appendix 5). At temperatures above 25 ° C or diameters of welded elements less than 300 mm with vertical arrangement Autoly 6, 10, 12, 18 are used as contact fluids, solid oil - according to GOST 4366-76 or other mineral oils similar to those indicated in viscosity.

Scheme for determining surface cleaning zones near the seam of a welded joint

D - thickness of welded elements, mm; a - input angle, degrees; d - distance from the insertion point to the rear edge of the finder, mm; - half the width of the seam reinforcement bead, mm; B 1 , B 2 , B 3 , - zones of surface cleaning when sounding with a direct, once and twice reflected beam, mm; m =20 mm

Marking the circular welded joint of the pipeline into sections and their numbering

1. The welded joint must be divided into 12 equal sections around the circumference of the elements being welded. 2. The boundaries of the sections are numbered from 1 to 12 in a clockwise direction with the indicated direction of movement of the product in the pipeline. 3. Plots are numbered with two numbers: 1-2, 2-3, etc. 4. The boundary between sections 11-12 and 12-1 should pass through the welder’s mark, perpendicular to the seam.

5.6. The frequency and angle of the finder prism are selected based on the thickness of the elements being welded and the sounding method according to the table. 1. 5.7. Sounding the seams should be done by transversely and longitudinally moving the finder along the prepared in accordance with paragraphs. 5.5.2, 5.5.3, 5.5.5 surface with simultaneous rotation of it at an angle of 3-5 ° in both directions from the direction of transverse movement. The size of the step of movement of the finder should be no more than half the diameter of the piezoelectric plate of the transducer (Table 2). 5.8. Checking basic control parameters. 5.8.1. Before setting up a flaw detector to test a specific product, the following basic control parameters must be checked in accordance with the requirements of GOST 14782-76: finder boom; angle of entry of the ultrasonic beam into the metal; dead zone; extreme sensitivity; resolution. 5.8.2. The finder arm and the angle of entry of the ultrasonic beam are checked at least once per shift. 5.8.3. The finder arrow is determined according to standard sample No. 3 according to GOST 14782-76 and it should not be less than the values ​​​​specified in the table. 2. 5.8.4. The angle of entry of the ultrasonic beam is determined according to standard sample No. 2 according to GOST 14782-76 and it should not differ from the nominal value by more than ± 1°. The nominal values ​​of the input angle for finders with different prism angles are given in Table 2.

table 2

FINDER PARAMETERS

Finder prism angle (b), degrees.

Operating frequency (f), MHz

Transducer diameter, mm

Finder boom, mm

Input angle (a) of the ultrasonic beam (plexiglass-steel), deg.

Note: The parameters are given for IC type finders (TU 25.06.1579-73 - collapsible finders with plexiglass prisms). 5.8.5. The “dead zone” is checked according to standard sample No. 2 GOST 14782-76 and when working with inclined finders with prism angles from 50° to 55° it should not exceed 3 mm, and when working with finders with prism angles of 30° and 40° it should not exceed 8 mm. In the standard sample, reflectors of the “side drilling” type with a diameter of 2 mm should be made at a depth of 3 and 8 mm from the surface of the finder to the center of the hole (Fig. 3). 5.8.6. The maximum sensitivity is determined by the area (mm 2) of the flat bottom of the hole, segment or corner reflector. The flat bottom of the hole and the plane of the segment should be oriented perpendicular to the acoustic axis of the finder. The amplitudes of the echo signals from the segmented reflector and the flat bottom of the hole with the same areas will be equal, provided that the height h of the segment is greater than the transverse wavelength, and the ratio of the height h and width b of the segment is not less than 0.4. The amplitudes of the echo signals from the corner reflector and the flat bottom of the hole (or segment reflector) will be equal, provided that the width b and height h of the vertical face of the corner reflector are greater than the transverse wavelength, the ratio h / b satisfies the inequality:

4.0>h/b>0.5,

And the areas S p of the flat bottom of the hole (or segment) and S 1 of the vertical face of the corner reflector are related by the relation:

S p = NS 1, where

N is the coefficient determined from the graph (Fig. 6). 5.8.7. The maximum sensitivity is checked on test samples with artificial reflectors, the area of ​​which is selected from the table. 1 depending on the thickness of the elements being welded and the type of finder selected.

Dependence of coefficientNfrom the cornerabeam input

5.8.8. The material of the test samples must be similar in terms of acoustic properties and surface cleanliness to the product being tested. The test samples must be free of defects (except for artificial reflectors) detected by the pulse echo method. 5.8.9. A reflector of the “hole with a flat bottom” type is made in the test sample in such a way that the center of the reflective surface of the bottom of the hole is located at a depth d equal to the thickness of the elements being welded (Fig. 7). 5.8.10. Test samples with corner or segment reflectors must have the same radius of curvature as the product being tested if the internal diameter of the elements being welded is less than 200 mm. When the internal diameter of the welded elements is 200 mm or more, test samples with plane-parallel surfaces are used (Fig. 8, 9). The method for manufacturing segmental reflectors is given in reference Appendix 6. The corner reflector in the test sample is made using a device from the KOU-2 kit. 5.8.11. The results of testing the maximum sensitivity are considered satisfactory if the signal amplitude from the artificial reflector is at least 30 mm across the CRT screen. 5.8.12. Resolution is checked using standard sample No. 1 according to GOST 14782-76. The resolution is considered satisfactory if the signals from three concentrically located cylindrical reflectors with diameters 15A 7, 20A 7, 30A 7, made in standard sample No. 1 (Fig. 1), are clearly distinguishable on the CRT screen.

Sample with a reflector type: “hole with a flat bottom” for adjusting the sensitivity of the flaw detector

Test sample with an angular reflector for adjusting sensitivity, determining the coordinates of defects and setting the control zone of the flaw detector

Where n is the number of reflections

Test sample with a segmented reflector for adjusting sensitivity, determining the coordinates of defects and setting the control zone of the flaw detector

The length of the test sample is determined by the formula:

L ¢ =(n+1) d × tg a +d+m+25; m=20,

Where n is the number of reflections

5.9. Setting up a flaw detector for inspection. 5.9.1. Connect a finder to the flaw detector with the parameters selected according to the table. 1 in accordance with the thickness of the elements being welded, the acoustic properties of the metal and the geometry of the welded joint. 5.9.2. Prepare the flaw detector for operation in accordance with the requirements of the operating instructions, and then configure it for testing a specific product in the following sequence (basic operations): set the sweep duration; adjust the depth measuring device; set the maximum sensitivity (first rejection level); sensitivity is equalized using a temporary sensitivity adjustment system (TSC); set search sensitivity; set the duration and position of the strobe pulse. 5.9.3. The sweep duration is set in such a way as to ensure the possibility of observing the signal from the most distant reflector on the CRT screen in accordance with the selected control parameters. 5.9.4. The strobe pulse is installed so that its leading edge is located near the probing pulse, and its rear edge is at the end of the CRT screen along the scan line. 5.9.5. Adjust the depth measuring device of the flaw detector according to the operating instructions. If the flaw detector does not have a depth-measuring device, then it is necessary to calibrate the scale of the CRT screen in accordance with the thickness of the product being tested. The method for determining coordinates on the CRT screen scale for the "ECHO" set is given in recommended appendix 7. The method for checking the depth gauge scale of the DUK-66P flaw detector is given in recommended appendix 8. 5.9.6. To set up the depth-measuring device, it is recommended to use test samples with artificial reflectors of the “side drilling” type in the case of testing welded joints with a wall thickness of more than 15 mm (recommended Appendix 8) and samples with segment or corner reflectors for welded joints with a wall thickness of 15 mm or less ( drawings 8 and 9). 5.9.7. Set the maximum sensitivity (first rejection level). The values ​​of the reflector area corresponding to the first rejection level for a specific controlled product are determined according to table. 1. 5.9.8. The flaw detector is adjusted to the first rejection level using the “attenuation” or “sensitivity”, “cut-off”, “power” and VRF regulators so that the height of the echo signal from the artificial reflector is equal to 30 mm, regardless of the control circuit in the absence of noise in the working section of the sweep . 5.9.9. Set the level of operation of the automatic defective alarm system (ADS). 5.9.10. The values ​​of the second rejection level of maximum sensitivity are set higher than the first by 3 dB. 5.9.11. To set the flaw detector to the second rejection level, turn the “weakening” control (for flaw detectors with an attenuator) 3 dB to the left (counterclockwise) or the “sensitivity” control (for flaw detectors without an attenuator) 1 division to the right clockwise relative to the first rejection level . 5.9.12. Set search sensitivity. The search sensitivity level values ​​are set above the first rejection level by 6 dB. 5.9.13. To adjust the flaw detector to search sensitivity, turn the “attenuation” knob 6 dB to the left (counterclockwise) or the “sensitivity” knob 2 notches to the right (clockwise) relative to the value of the first rejection level. 5.9.14. Set the duration and position of the strobe pulse in accordance with the controlled thickness and method of sounding according to the method outlined in the recommended Appendix 9.

6. CONTROL

6.1. The inspection includes the operations of sounding the weld metal and the heat-affected zone and determining the measured characteristics of defects. 6.2. Sounding of seams is carried out using the method of transverse-longitudinal movement of the finder, set out in paragraph 5.7. The speed of movement of the finder should be no more than 30 mm/s. 6.3. Acoustic contact of the finder with the surface on which it moves is ensured through the contact liquid by lightly pressing the finder. The stability of the acoustic contact is evidenced by a decrease in the amplitude levels of the signals at the trailing edge of the probing pulse, created by the acoustic noise of the finder, compared to their level when the acoustic contact of the finder with the surface of the product deteriorates or is absent. 6.4. Sounding of welded joints is carried out at search sensitivity, and the characteristics of identified defects are determined at the first and second rejection levels. Only those echo signals are analyzed that are observed in the strobe pulse and have a height of at least 30 mm at the search sensitivity. 6.5. During the inspection process, it is necessary to check the setting of the flaw detector to the first rejection level at least twice a shift. 6.6. At the first rejection level, defects are assessed by amplitude, and at the second rejection level, the conditional length, conditional distance between defects and the number of defects are assessed. 6.7. The seams of welded joints sound with direct and once reflected rays on both sides (Fig. 10). When echo signals appear near the trailing or leading edges of the strobe pulse, it is necessary to clarify whether they are a consequence of reflection of the ultrasonic beam from reinforcement or sagging at the root of the seam (Fig. 11). To do this, measure the distances L 1 and L 2 - the position of the finders (I), at which the echo signal from the reflector has the maximum amplitude, and then place the finder on the other side of the seam at the same distances L 1 and L 2 from the reflector - the position of the finders (II). If there are no defects under the surface of the reinforcement bead or at the root of the weld, echo signals will not be observed at the edges of the strobe pulse. If the echo signal is caused by reflection from the reinforcement of the suture, then when it is touched with a tampon moistened with contact fluid, the amplitude of the echo signal will change in time with the touch of the tampon. It must be taken into account that acceptable undercuts can also cause false echoes. In this case, it is recommended to clean the area of ​​the weld that gives the reflection flush with the surface of the base metal and then re-inspect. If there are no defects, echo signals will not be observed at the edges of the strobe pulse.

Patterns for sounding seams with symmetrical cutting of edges

A - with a bevel of two edges, b - with a curved bevel of two edges

Scheme for decoding false echoes

A - from sagging at the root of the seam; b - from the seam reinforcement roller

6.8. Butt joints with a bevel of one edge with a wall thickness of more than 18 mm are recommended, in addition to sounding on both sides according to the method for symmetrical cutting, to additionally sound with finders with a prism angle of 54° (53°) on the side of the edge without the bevel (Fig. 12). In this case, the searcher movement zone and the stripping zone are calculated using the formulas in clause 5.5.2, and the maximum sensitivity (the first rejection level) is set equal to 6 mm 2. 6.9. When half the width of the seam reinforcement l /2 does not exceed the distance L 1 from the front edge of the finder to the projection of the supposed defect at the root of the weld on the surface of the welded joint, sounding the lower part of the weld is performed with a direct beam (Fig. 13a), and when l /2 exceeds L 1 the lower part of the seam is sounded by a doubly reflected beam (Fig. 13b). 6.10. To compare the values ​​of quantities l /2 and L 1 it is recommended to experimentally determine the distance L 1 (Fig. 14). The finder is installed at the end of the tested pipe or test sample used to adjust the flaw detector to the first rejection level. By moving the finder perpendicular to the end, fix the position of the finder at which the echo signal from the lower corner will be maximum, and then measure the distance L 1. 6.11. With unilateral access to the seam, it is sounded only on one side (Fig. 15). If the thickness of the welded elements is no more than 18 mm, the seam should be additionally sounded with finders with a prism angle of 54° (53°) according to the method described in clause 6.8. In the conclusion and in the control log, an appropriate entry must be made that the sounding was carried out only on one side of the seam.

Patterns for sounding seams with asymmetrical cutting of edges

A - with a bevel of one edge; b - with a curved bevel of one edge; c - with a stepped bevel of one edge; a 2 > a 1 ; a 2 =54°(53°)

Scheme of sounding the lower part of the seam.

A - size l /2 less than L 1 by such an amount that the searcher movement area equal to L 1 - l /2 allows you to fully sound the root of the seam with a direct beam; b - area of ​​movement of the finder equal to L 1 - l /2 allows you to sound only part of the root of the seam with a direct beam, and the rest with a doubly reflected beam

Scheme of experimental determination of distance

Scheme of sounding a seam with unilateral access

Scheme of sounding a seam with different wall thicknesses of joined elements

6.12. If the joined elements have different thicknesses without bevelling a wall of greater thickness, then sounding should be performed in accordance with clause 6.7. When a signal appears near the trailing edge of the strobe pulse, it is necessary to take into account that when the finder is located on the side of the thicker wall of the element at a distance L 1 = tg a from the weld axis, the signal is from the lower corner of the wall and the signal from the defect in the root of the seam (Fig. 16) can be observed as a single signal. To determine from which reflector the signal is observed, it is necessary to install the finder on the side of the thinner wall thickness of the element at a distance L 1 from the axis of the seam. In this case, if the signal is not observed near the trailing edge of the strobe pulse, there is no defect, but if the signal is observed, then a defect is detected in the root of the weld. 6.13. If the joined elements have different thicknesses with a bevel of a wall of greater thickness, then on the side of the smaller thickness the sounding is performed according to clause 6.7, and on the side of the greater wall thickness of the element - according to the diagrams shown in Fig. 17, 18. The thickness of the walls of the joined pipes and the actual boundary (length) of the bevel are determined with a direct finder in accordance with the recommended Appendix 10. 6.14. The main measured characteristics of identified defects are: amplitude of the echo signal from the defect; defect coordinates; conditional length of the defect; conditional distance between defects; the number of defects in any section of a 100 mm long seam. 6.15. The amplitude in dB of the echo signal from the defect is determined by the readings of the “attenuation” regulator (attenuator).

Schemes for sounding seams with a direct and once reflected beam from the side of an element of greater thickness

Intervals of movement of the finder when sounding a seam: a - with a straight beam from L "to L", where L "= l /2 +n; L "= d × tg a; b - once reflected beam from to , where =5(d 1 - d)+10+ d 1 × tg a, =2 d 1 × tg a + l /2 ; L =5(d 1 - d).

Scheme of sounding seams with a doubly reflected beam from the side of an element of greater thickness

The interval of movement of the finder from to , where =2 d 1 × tg a + l /2 ; =(2 d 1 + d) tg a

6.16. The coordinates of the defect - the distance L from the beam entry point to the projection of the defect onto the surface of the welded joint and the depth H - are determined in accordance with the requirements of the operating instructions for flaw detectors (Figure 19) 6.17. The coordinates of the defect are determined at the maximum amplitude of the reflected signal. If the echo signal goes beyond the screen, then the “attenuation” or “sensitivity” controls reduce its amplitude so that the maximum signal is in the range from 30 to 40 mm. 6.18. The conditional length of the defect and the conditional distance between defects are determined according to GOST 14782-76. When measuring these characteristics, the extreme positions of the finder should be considered those at which the amplitude of the echo signal from the defect is 0.2 of the vertical size of the working field of the CRT screen.

7. PROCESSING AND REGISTRATION OF CONTROL RESULTS

7.1. Assessment of the quality of seams of welded joints. 7.1.1. The measured characteristics of defects in the seams of welded joints are assessed in accordance with the requirements of this standard and the current regulatory and technical documentation. The maximum permissible values ​​of the measured characteristics of defects, established taking into account the requirements of SNiP III -31-78, are given in table. 3. 7.1.2. The quality of the seams of welded joints is assessed based on the results of control according to the principle: “pass” - “fail”. The term “passable” evaluates the seams of welded joints without defects or with defects, the measured characteristics of which do not exceed the standards specified in Table. 3. The term “unfit” is used to evaluate the seams of welded joints if defects are found in them, the measured characteristics of which exceed the standards specified in the table. 3.

Determination of defect coordinates

Table 3

MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE VALUES OF MEASURED CHARACTERISTICS AND NUMBER OF DEFECTS IN WELDED JOINTS

Nominal thickness of welded elements, mm

Amplitude estimation

Evaluation by conditional length, conditional distance between defects and number of defects

Conditional length (mm) of a defect located at depth, mm

The number of defects acceptable according to the measured characteristics on any 100 mm of seam length

Total conventional length (mm) of permissible defects for any 100 mm of seam length located at a depth, mm

from 6.0 to 20.0 incl.

First rejection level

Second rejection level

over 20.0 to 40.0 incl.

over 40.0 to 50.0 incl.

Note: Two adjacent defects with a conventional distance between them less than the conventional length of the smaller defect are considered one defect with a conventional length equal to the sum of the lengths of the first defect, the distance between the defects and the second defect. 7.2. Registration of control results. 7.2.1. The results of inspection of each welded joint must be recorded in a log and in a conclusion. 7.2.2. Registration of inspection results in a journal must be carried out by the flaw detectorist who carried out the inspection, and the correctness of the specified data must be controlled by the person responsible for preparing the documentation. 7.2.3. Journal forms and conclusions, as well as examples of entries in them, are given in recommended appendices 11 and 12. 7.2.4. The control log and copies of conclusions must be stored at the enterprise that carried out the control for at least 5 years after the facility is put into operation. 7.2.5. An abbreviated description of defects in the inspection log and in the conclusion must be carried out in accordance with GOST 14782-76. 7.2.6. For seams with unacceptable defects, in addition to the conclusion, defectograms must be drawn up. The form of the defectogram is given in recommended Appendix 13.

ANNEX 1

Operating frequencies, MHz

Attenuator dynamic range, dB

Maximum sounding depth (for steel), mm

Availability of depth gauge

Dimensions of the working part of the CRT screen, mm

Operating temperature range, ° K (° C).

Dimensions, mm

Weight, kg

Supply voltage, V

Power type

UDM-1M

0,80; 1,80; 2,50; 5,00

70 diameter

278-303 (from +5 to +30)

220 × 335 × 423

UDM-3

0,60; 1,80; 2,50; 5,00

DUK-66P

125; 2,50; 5,00; 10,00

(from minus 10 to +40)

260×160×425

DUK-66PM

260 × 170 × 435

220, 127, 36, 24

UD-10P

0,60; 1,25; 2,50; 5,00

50 (in steps of 2dB)

278-323 (from +5 to +50)

345 × 195 × 470

From an alternating current network with a frequency of 50 Hz; batteries

40 (smooth)

UD-24

1,25; 2,50; 5,00; 10,00

263-323 (from minus 10 to +50)

130 × 255 × 295

Same UD-10UA

500 (for aluminum)

278-424 (from +5 to +50)

520 × 490 × 210

From AC mains with a frequency of 50 Hz Specialized ultrasound kit "ECHO"** ("ECHO-2"***)

258-313 (from minus 15 to +40)

140 × 240 × 397

From an alternating current network with a frequency of 50 Hz; batteries Notes: *The coordinates of defects are determined using the scale of the CRT screen. **The "ECHO" set ("ECHO-2") is produced by the Sverdlovsk pilot plant Glavmontazhavtomatika, the rest of the flaw detectors are produced by the "Electrotochpribor" plant "VOLNA" in Chisinau. ***The "ECHO-2" set has a VRCH system and is equipped with a digital indicator IKD-1 for determining the coordinates of defects.

APPENDIX 2

METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE LINEARITY OF THE SPECIALIZED "ECHO" KIT

The linearity of the scan line is determined as follows: 1. Connect a direct finder to socket 1 of the flaw detector. 2. The toggle switch for the “type of work” switch is set to position 1. 3. The attenuator switches “fine” and “coarse” are set to position “0”. 4. If necessary, use the “noise cut-off” control to remove noise from the scan line. 5. Use the " " knob to remove the strobe pulse from the screen. 6. The “rough scan” switch is set to position “5”. 7. The “sweep smoothly” regulator is set to the extreme right position. 8. Install the finder on the surface of standard sample No. 2 GOST 14782-76. 9. Achieve the maximum number of reflected bottom signals on the screen so that they are distributed along the entire scan line. 10. Measure the distance between the leading edges of the reflected signals using a scale on the CRT screen. 11. Linearity is considered satisfactory if the distances between the pulses do not differ from each other by more than 10%. 12. Linearity is checked in the same way for the remaining sweep ranges.

APPENDIX 3

Name of the organization issuing the application

APPLICATION No.
for ultrasonic inspection of seams in welded joints

1. The application was made by __________________________________________________________ (initials and surname) 2. Name of the object ___________________________________________________ 3. Name and a brief description of controlled product ____________ ________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________

(T - temperature, º K (º C); P - pressure (kgf/cm 2);

________________________________________________________________________

4. Drawing number __________________________________________________________ 5. Layout of controlled areas, their numbering, sketch cross section seam indicating the geometry of the groove, the thickness of the welded elements and the width of the seam reinforcement. 6. Number of the seam or joint section ____________________________________________ 7. Number of joints (pcs.) subject to inspection _____________________________________ 8. Volume of inspection (%) of the joint perimeter ___________________________________ 9. Primary or repeated inspection ____________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________

(if control was previously carried out, then it is necessary to indicate

________________________________________________________________________

method and date of control)

10. External and internal diameter (mm) of the elements being welded ________________ 11. Type (method) of welding ___________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ 12. Brand of metal of the elements being welded ___________________________________ 13. Brand of electrode _________________________________________________ 14. Initials, surname and brand of the welder ___________________________________ 15. Date of welding __________________________________________________________ 16. Degree preparedness of the workplace for inspection in accordance with the requirements of OST _________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ Application submitted " " 19

APPENDIX 4

APPLICATION REGISTRATION JOURNAL FORM

APPENDIX 5

CONTACT LIQUIDS

Contact fluid of the Taganrog plant "Krasny Kotelshchik"

The easily washable inhibitor contact fluid has the following composition: water, l.................................................... ........................................................ ........................... 8 sodium nitrite (technical), kg................ ........................................................ ..... 1.6 starch (potato), kg.................................... ........................................... 0.24 glycerin (technical) , kg........................................ ........................... 0.45 soda ash (technical), kg......... ........................................... 0.048

Cooking method

Soda and sodium nitrite are dissolved in 5 liters of cold water and boiled in a clean container. Starch is dissolved in 3 liters of cold water and poured into a boiling solution of sodium nitrite and soda. The solution is boiled for 3-4 minutes, after which glycerin is poured into it, then the solution is cooled. Contact liquid is used at temperatures from +3 to +38 º C.

Contact fluid of Chernivtsi Machinery Plant

The contact liquid is an aqueous solution of polyacrylamide and sodium nitrite in the following ratio: polyacrylamide in % ................................... ........................................................ .......... from 0.8 to 2 sodium nitrite in% .................................... ........................................................ ............... from 0.4 to 1% water .............................. ........................................................ ................................ from 98.8 to 97

Cooking method

500 g of technical (8%) polyacrylamide and 1.3 liters of water are loaded into a steel tank with a capacity of 3 liters, equipped with a stirrer at a speed of 800-900 rpm, and stirred for 10-15 minutes. until a homogeneous solution of sodium nitrite is obtained. The appropriate amount of polyacrylamide, sodium nitrite solution and water is loaded into the hopper. Then the motor and the contents of the hopper are turned on for 5-10 minutes. pumped repeatedly until a homogeneous mass is obtained. When using a pump with a capacity of 12.5 l/min. An electric motor with a power of 1 kW is used.

APPENDIX 6

Information

METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEGMENTAL REFLECTORS

Segmental reflectors are made on the surface of the test sample by milling on a jig boring machine according to the scheme (Fig. 1). The diameter of the cutter is selected depending on the required area of ​​the segment reflector. The milling depth H is selected according to the graphs (Fig. 2, 3). The inclination angle α of the cutter is set equal to the angle of input of ultrasonic vibrations. It is allowed to manufacture segment reflectors on milling machines. The milling depth H is measured with an indicator with a needle bore gauge.

Method for manufacturing segment reflectors

Graph of the dependence of the milling depth "H" on the segment area "S" for finders with different prism angles (cutter diameter 3 mm)

Graph of the dependence of the milling depth "H" on the area "S" for finders with different prism angles (cutter diameter 6 mm)

APPENDIX 7

METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE COORDINATES OF DEFECTS WITH THE "ECHO" SET WHEN INSPECTION OF WELDED JOINTS SEAMS

1. General instructions

1.1. The coordinates "H" and "L" are determined directly from the scale of the CRT screen. 1.2. To determine coordinates on a scale, perform the following operations: select the working sweep range; the position and duration of the strobe pulse are set in accordance with the seam control zone of the welded joint and the scale is calibrated in relation to the thickness of the elements being welded, and the scale factors KH and KL are calculated. 1.3. The ECHO set is configured using a test sample, which is used to adjust the sensitivity during testing. 1.4. For convenience of calculations, the value of the small horizontal scale division is taken to be 0.2. 1.5. The "Y" regulator aligns the scan line with the lower horizontal scale line, and the "X" regulator aligns the maximum amplitude of the probing pulse with the first left vertical scale line of the screen. 1.6. Set the “coarse sweep” switch to position “5” and the “ ” knob to the extreme right position. 1.7. Use the " " regulator to set the leading edge of the strobe pulse near the trailing edge of the probing pulse (PS), and use the " " regulator to set the duration of the strobe pulse such that its trailing edge is located at the end of the scale.

2. Methodology for determining the coordinates of defects when sounding the seams of welded joints with a direct beam

2.1. In accordance with the thickness of 6 welded elements according to table. 1 determine the scale factor K N.

Table 1

2.2. In accordance with the thickness δ "(part of the thickness) of the seam of the welded joint, control of which is possible with a direct beam, equal to the distance from the center of reflector 1 (of the “side drilling” type) to the bottom of the test sample (Drawing 1), the number of divisions that is necessary is determined by the formula install between the leading edges of signals (1) and (2). 2.4. The “coarse sweep”, “” and “” regulators achieve a distance between the leading edges of the maximum amplitudes of signals (2) and (1) equal to N large divisions, using the method of successive approximation (in the example considered in Figure 1 N = 4 ,4).

An example of scale graduation when sounding the seams of welded joints with a direct beam

2.5. Using the " " regulator, combine the leading edge of the strobe pulse with the position of the leading edge of the signal (1). 2.6. Use the " " regulator to align the trailing edge of the strobe pulse with the position of the leading edge of the signal (2). 2.7. To determine the coordinates of the defect, set the maximum amplitude of the signal from the reflector detected in the control zone (for example, signal (3) from reflector 3, Fig. 1). Then count the number of divisions N i from the trailing edge of the strobe pulse to the leading edge of the signal from the defect in the control zone and determine the depth (H) of the defect using the formula:

H= δ -N i K N;

In the example of hell. 1 N i = 2.6. 2.8. Distance L is determined by the formula:

3. Methodology for determining the coordinates of defects when sounding the seams of welded joints with a direct and once reflected beam

3.1. In accordance with the thickness δ of the welded elements according to table. 2 determine the scale factor K H .

table 2

3.2. The number of divisions N p is determined, which is set between the positions of the leading edges of signals from reflectors 2 and 4 when sounded by a single reflected beam (Fig. 2) according to the formula:

N p = δ / K H .

3.3. The number of divisions is determined, which is set between the positions of the leading edges of signals (1) and (2) from reflectors 1 and 2 when sounded by a direct beam (Fig. 2) according to the formula:

N l = δ "/ K H.

3.4. By moving the finder along the test sample, they achieve the maximum amplitude of the signal (4) from the reflector 4 (Fig. 2), located at the maximum distance from the beam entry point when sounded by a single reflected beam. 3.5. Set the "scan coarse" switch and the "" regulator signal (4) between 8 and 9 large divisions of the horizontal scale. 3.6. Using the " " and " " controls, using the method of successive approximations, the leading edge of the maximum signal amplitude (2) from reflector 2 is aligned with the middle of the scale, and the leading edge of the maximum signal amplitude (4) from reflector 4 is located at a distance equal to N n divisions (clause 3.2.) from the middle of the scale to the right. 3.7. Using the " " regulator, set the leading edge of the strobe pulse at a distance equal to N l divisions (clause 3.3.) from the middle of the scale to the left, corresponding to the position of the leading edge of the maximum amplitude of the signal (1) from reflector 1. 3.8. Use the " " regulator to align the trailing edge of the strobe pulse with the position of the leading edge of the maximum amplitude of the signal (4) from reflector 4 (clause 3.6.).

An example of scale graduation when sounding the seams of welded joints with a direct and once reflected beam

3.9. All signals detected within the duration of the set strobe pulse from its leading edge to the middle of the scale are considered to be detected by a direct beam, and from the middle of the scale to the trailing edge - by a single reflected beam. 3.10. Depths (N l, N p) of detected defects in the area of ​​direct beam sounding are determined by the formula:

N l = δ - N l i K N;

Where N l i is the number of scale divisions, counted from the middle to the leading edge of the signal from the defect, and in the sound zone of a single reflected beam is determined by the formula:

N p = δ - N p i K N;

Where N p i is the number of scale divisions, counted from the trailing edge of the strobe pulse to the leading edge of the signal from the defect. 3.11. Determine the distance L l in the sounding area with a direct beam using the formula:

L l =N l · tg α ;

A once reflected beam according to the formula:

L p =(2 δ -Н p) · tg α ;

3.12. The method for setting up the "ECHO" kit to determine the coordinates of defects while simultaneously sounding the seams of welded joints with single- and double-reflected beams is similar to the above. In this case, the coordinates H and L are determined by the formulas:

N= N l i K N;

Where KH increases 3 times compared to the values ​​in the table. 1.

L p = [(n +1) δ -Н p ] · tg α .

APPENDIX 8

METHOD FOR CHECKING THE ERROR OF THE DEPTH GAUGE OF THE DUK-66P FEFECTOSCOPE

1.1. Set the scale selected in accordance with the operating frequency and angle of the finder prism. 1.2. The finder is moved along the surface of the test sample and, upon receiving a signal of maximum amplitude from each of the three holes (see drawing), the coordinates H and L are measured using a depth-measuring device. 1.3. The coordinates determined by the depth gauge are compared with the coordinates measured by metric means directly on the sample. 1.4. If the permissible error (according to the passport for the flaw detector) obtained from the results of the above comparison is exceeded, it is recommended to send the device for verification.

Test sample with "side drilling" type reflectors for checking and adjusting the depth gauge scale of a flaw detector type DUK-66P

APPENDIX 9

METHOD FOR SETTING THE DURATION AND POSITION OF THE STROBE PULSE

1.1. The duration and position of the strobe pulse are set in accordance with the selected sounding method (direct, once or twice reflected beam). 1.2. The flaw detector is adjusted using a test sample with reflectors used to set the maximum sensitivity (the first rejection level). 1.3. In flaw detectors UDM-1M, UDM-3, DUK-66P, DUK-66PM, with the exception of the “ECHO” set, the technique for setting the strobe pulse is similar. 1.4. The method for setting the duration and position of the strobe pulse for the "ECHO" set is directly related to the method for determining coordinates and is outlined in recommended Appendix 7. 1.5. When sounding the seam of a welded joint with a direct and single-reflected beam, the leading edge of the strobe pulse is set along the leading edge of the signal with maximum amplitude reflected from the lower reflector (corner or segment), and the trailing edge of the strobe pulse is set along the trailing edge of the signal with maximum amplitude reflected from the upper reflector - corner or segment (Fig. 1). With this setting, echoes appearing at the beginning of the strobe pulse indicate the presence of defects in the lower part of the seam, and echoes at the end of the strobe pulse indicate the presence of defects in the upper part of the seam.

Scheme for determining the duration and position of a strobe pulse when sounding a seam with a direct and once reflected beam

L "is calculated depending on δ, α and the sound pattern using the formula: L "=(n +1) d × tg a + d + m +25, where n is the number of reflections

1.6. When sounding the seam of a welded joint with a double and once reflected beam, the leading edge of the strobe pulse is set along the leading edge of the signal with maximum amplitude reflected from the upper reflector, and the trailing edge of the strobe pulse is set along the trailing edge of the maximum signal with maximum amplitude reflected from the lower reflector . With this setting, echo signals at the beginning of the strobe pulse indicate the presence of defects in the upper part of the seam, and echo signals at the end of the strobe pulse indicate the presence of defects in the lower part of the seam (Fig. 2) 1.7. The position of the strobe pulse is set using the “X offset” regulator symmetrically relative to the middle of the CRT screen scale for all flaw detectors with the exception of the “ECHO” set.

Scheme for determining the duration and position of a strobe pulse when sounding a seam with a single and double reflected beam

calculated depending on δ, α and the sound pattern using the formula: =(n +1) d × tg a + d + m +25, where n is the number of reflections

APPENDIX 10

DETERMINATION OF THE WALL THICKNESS OF WELDED ELEMENTS AND THE ACTUAL BOUNDARY (LENGTH) OF THE BEvel USING A DIRECT FINDER

1.1. The finder is installed on the surface of the welded elements, previously prepared for inspection on both sides of the seam and covered with a contact liquid, at a distance of at least 40 mm from the line of transition of the seam into the base metal. If the diameter of the welded elements is less than 300 mm, the specified surface is cleaned until a flat plane is obtained with a width greater than the diameter of the straight finder (see drawing). 1.2. Using a depth-measuring device configured for measurement with a direct finder according to the instructions for the flaw detector, the thickness of the walls of the elements being welded is determined. 1.3. To determine the actual boundary (length L ck) of the bevel, the finder is moved along the surface of the element having a large thickness towards the seam until a sharp increase in the distance between the probing and the nearest reflected pulses appears in comparison with the distance between the remaining multiple reflected signals. Having marked the position of the finder found in this way (see the explanatory diagram in the drawing), the distance L ck from the center line of the seam to the position of the mark on the surface of the element is measured with a ruler.

Scheme of sounding the walls of welded elements with a direct finder to determine their thickness and bevel length

SI - probing pulse; 1,2,3... signals reflected from the opposite side of the wall of the elements being welded

APPENDIX 11

JOURNAL OF ULTRASONIC TESTING

Conclusion number and date of issue

Date of control

Name of the control object and its address

Scope of control

Characteristics of the welded joint

Control parameters

Control results

Assessing the seam quality of a welded joint

Information about re-inspection

Last name of flaw detector

Signature of the flaw detector

Note

Connection type

Index (number) of the seam according to the drawing

Diameter and thickness of welded elements, mm

Steel grade

Welding method

Flaw detector type and number

Operating frequency, MHz

Finder prism type and goal, deg

Area of ​​maximum permissible equivalent defect

Weld joint section number

Brief description of detected defects

Number of detected defects per 100 mm of seam length

Conditional length of defects per 100 mm of seam length, mm

APPENDIX 12

(Object name)

(name of the organization that carried out the control -

Line no.

trust installation department, laboratory)

CONCLUSION No.___
on checking the quality of seams of butt welded joints of pipelines using the ultrasonic method

Drawing (form, wiring diagram) No. _______________________________________________________________________________ Last name, first name, patronymic and number of the welder's mark _____________________________________________________________________ Type of flaw detector and its serial number ____________________________________________________________________________ Head of the laboratory ________________________________________________________________ signature (last name, first name, patronymic) Flaw detector for ultrasonic testing ___________________________________ signature (last name, first name, patronymic)
Note: 1. The conclusion number must be the serial number of the corresponding entry in the ultrasonic testing log. 2. The control diagram is shown on the back.

APPENDIX 13

DEFECTOGRAM No. 6 OF WELDED JOINT No. 30 ENTRY No. 21 IN THE ULTRASONIC TESTING JOURNAL

(filling example)

Note: the "+" arrow indicates the direction of movement of the product away from us perpendicular to the drawing plane

1. Purpose of the method. 2 2. Requirements for flaw detectors and the ultrasonic testing area. 2 3. Safety requirements. 3 4. Requirements for equipment and materials.. 4 5. Preparation for control.. 7 6. Conducting control. 14 7. Processing and registration of control results. 19 Appendix 1 Recommended flaw detectors and their main technical characteristics. 21 Appendix 2 Methodology for determining the linearity of the scan of a specialized "echo" set. 22 Appendix 3 Application for ultrasonic testing of welded joints. 22 Appendix 4 Application log form. 23 Appendix 5 Contact liquids. 23 Appendix 6 Method of manufacturing segmented reflectors. 23 Appendix 7 Methodology for determining the coordinates of defects using the “echo” set when inspecting the seams of welded joints. 25 Appendix 8 Methodology for checking the error of the depth gauge of the duk-66p flaw detector. 28 Appendix 9 Methodology for establishing the duration and position of the strobe pulse. 29 Appendix 10 Determination of the wall thickness of the elements being welded and the actual boundary (length) of the bevel using a straight finder.. 30 Appendix 11 Ultrasonic testing journal. 32 Appendix 12 Conclusion on checking the quality of seams of butt welded joints of pipelines using the ultrasonic method. 32 Appendix 13 Defectogram No. 6 of welded joint No. 30, entry No. 21 in the ultrasonic testing log. 33

Ultrasonic testing is carried out on process pipelines (to the extent according to the category of the pipeline), pipelines of heating networks (depending on the conditions of laying the pipeline and the requirements of the operating organization), fire pipelines, gas pipelines, steam pipelines, drill pipe and pump-compressor pipe, etc.

Ultrasonic testing pipe inspection is a pipeline diagnostics for the presence of internal defects. Both the pipe body itself and the weld seam can be inspected. This type of flaw detection can be carried out both in a specially equipped laboratory on the territory of our enterprise (if the dimensions of the product do not exceed 2000 mm in length and 500 mm in diameter and the weight of the product does not exceed 150 kg), and at the actual location of the object.

If the pipeline is operational, ultrasonic testing is carried out after drainage (removal) of the transported medium. Ultrasonic testing is possible without stopping technological process, without stopping production (unlike X-ray inspection).

Ultrasonic testing must be carried out not only when putting pipelines into operation, during the pipe certification procedure, but also on a regular basis in order to prevent premature wear of pipes and the occurrence of emergency situations.

The procedure for ultrasonic flaw detection of pipelines consists of the following activities:

    preparing welded joints for inspection (cleaning). Carried out by the customer or by the laboratory by agreement.

    weld marking

    direct inspection of the pipeline - inspection of welds or continuous inspection of the pipeline metal, thickness gauging if necessary.

    marking defective areas if repairs are possible

    drawing up a pipeline diagram and conclusions based on inspection results

As you have already seen, ultrasonic inspection of pipes is very effective method flaw detection. Besides, this type control has also proven itself to be the most accurate, efficient, low-cost and safe for humans.

Contact us and we will organize for you the full range of works on ultrasonic testing of pipelines, we will identify weak spots objects, existing defects, we will provide complete information about their size and location relative to the surface of the product, we will examine welds and joints also in order to control their quality. It is thanks to such checks that you ensure long-term uninterrupted, and most importantly safe work equipment.

In construction, pipes with Ø from 28 to 1420 mm with a wall thickness from 3 to 30 mm are used. The entire range of diameters according to flaw detection can be divided into 3 groups:

  1. Ø from 28 to 100 mm and H from 3 to 7 mm
  2. Ø from 108 to 920 mm and H from 4 to 25 mm
  3. Ø from 1020 to 1420 mm and H from 12 to 30 mm

According to studies that were carried out at MSTU. N.E. Bauman for Lately, in the process of developing methods for ultrasonic testing of welded pipe joints, this very important factor, as anisotropy of the elastic characteristics of the pipe material.

Anisotropy of pipe steel, its features

Anisotropy- this is the difference in the properties of a medium (for example, physical: thermal conductivity, elasticity, electrical conductivity, etc.) in different directions within a given medium.

In the process of ultrasonic testing of welded joints of main gas pipelines assembled from pipes of domestic and foreign production, the omission of serious root defects, inaccurate assessment of their coordinates, and a significant level of acoustic noise were discovered.

It turned out that if optimal control parameters are observed and during its implementation, the main reason for missing a defect is the presence of significant anisotropy in the elastic properties of the base material. It affects the speed, attenuation and deviation from straightness of the ultrasonic beam.

During the sounding of metal, more than 200 pieces of pipes according to the scheme shown in Fig. 1, it turned out that the standard deviation of the wave speed with this direction of motion and polarization is equal to 2 m/s (for transverse waves). Deviations of velocities from the table values ​​of 100 m/s or more are not random and are probably associated with the production technology of rolled products and pipes. Such deviations have a strong influence on the propagation of polarized waves. In addition to the indicated anisotropy, inhomogeneity of the speed of sound across the thickness of the pipe wall was also discovered.

Rice. 1. Designations of deposits in the pipe metal: X, Y, Z. - directions of ultrasound propagation: x. y.z: - polarization directions; Y - rolling direction: Z - perpendicular to the plane of the pipe

The structure of rolled sheets is layered, consisting of metal fibers and other inclusions elongated during deformation. In addition, due to the effect of the thermomechanical rolling cycle on the metal, sections of the sheet that are uneven in thickness are subject to various deformations. These features cause the speed of sound to additionally depend on the depth of the sound layer.

Features of control of welded seams of pipes of various diameters

Pipes Ø from 28 to 100 mm

A distinctive feature of welded seams of pipes Ø from 28 to 100 mm with H from 3 to 7 mm is the occurrence of sagging inside the pipe. This causes false echo signals from them to appear on the screen of the flaw detector during testing with a direct beam, which coincide in time with the echo signals reflected from the root defects found by a single reflected beam. Due to the fact that the effective width of the beam is comparable to the thickness of the pipe wall, it is extremely difficult to identify the reflector by the location of the finder relative to the reinforcement roller. There is also an uncontrolled zone in the center of the seam due to the large width of the seam bead. All this is the reason for the low probability (10-12%) of detecting unacceptable volumetric defects, although unacceptable planar defects are detected much better (~ 85%). The main characteristics of sagging - depth, width and angle of contact with the surface of the object - are random variables for this standard size of pipe; the average values ​​are respectively 2.7 mm; 6.5 mm and 56°30".

Rolled steel behaves as an anisotropic and inhomogeneous medium with rather complex dependences of the velocities of elastic waves on the direction of polarization and sounding. The speed of sound changes approximately symmetrically with respect to the middle of the sheet section, and in the region of this middle the transverse wave speed can greatly (up to 10%) decrease compared to the surrounding areas. The shear wave speed in the controlled objects varies in the range from 3070 to 3420 m/s. At a depth of up to 3 mm from the surface of the rolled product, the speed of the transverse wave may increase slightly (up to 1%).

Noise immunity of control increases significantly in the case of using inclined separate-combined probes of the RSN type (Fig. 2), which are called chordal. They were designed at MSTU. N.E. Bauman. A special feature of the inspection is that there is no need for cross scanning when searching for defects. It is performed only along the perimeter of the pipe at the moment the front face of the converter is pressed against the seam.

Rice. 2. Inclined chord RSN-PEP: 1 - emitter: 2 - receiver

Pipes Ø from 108 to 920 mm

Pipes with Ø from 108 to 920 mm with H from 4 to 25 mm are also connected by one-sided welding without back welding. Until recently, the control of these connections was carried out using combined probes according to a method developed for pipes with Ø from 28 to 100 mm. But such a control technique requires the presence of a fairly large zone of coincidence (zone of uncertainty). This significantly reduces the accuracy of connection quality assessment. In addition, combined probes are characterized by a high level of reverberation noise, which makes it difficult to decipher signals, as well as uneven sensitivity, which cannot always be compensated by available means. The use of chordal separate-combined probes for the purpose of monitoring this standard size of welded joints is impractical, since due to the limited values ​​of the input angles of ultrasonic vibrations from the surface of the welded joint, the dimensions of the transducers increase significantly, and the area of ​​acoustic contact becomes larger.

At MSTU. N. E. Bauman created inclined probes with leveled sensitivity to perform inspection of welded joints with a diameter of 100 mm or more. Sensitivity equalization ensures that the rotation angle 2 is selected in such a way that the upper part and middle of the seam are sounded by the central once reflected beam, and the lower part by direct peripheral rays that fall on the defect at an angle Y from the central one. In Fig. Figure 3 shows a graph of the dependence of the angle of introduction of the transverse wave on the angle of rotation and opening of the directional pattern Y. In such probes, the incident and reflected waves from the defect are horizontally polarized (SH-wave).

Rice. 3. Changing the input angle alpha, within the limit of half the opening angle of the RSN-PEP radiation pattern, depending on the rotation angle delta.

It is clear from the graphs that when testing objects with a wall thickness of 25 mm, the uneven sensitivity of the RS-probe reaches 5 dB, while for a combined probe it can reach 25 dB. RS-PEP is characterized by an increased signal-to-interference level and, therefore, increased absolute sensitivity. For example, the RS-PEP easily detects a defect with an area of ​​0.5 mm2 during the inspection of a welded joint 10 mm thick with both direct and once reflected beams with a useful signal/interference ratio of 10 dB. The procedure for performing control with probe data is the same as for a combined probe.

Pipes Ø from 1020 to 1420 mm

Welded joints of pipes Ø from 1020 to 1420 mm with H from 12 to 30 mm are performed by double-sided welding or with back welding of the seam bead. In seams that are made by double-sided welding, usually, false signals from the trailing edge of the reinforcement roller do not cause as much interference as in single-sided seams. Their amplitude is not so great due to the smoother contours of the roller. In addition, they are further along the scan. For this reason, this is the most suitable pipe size for flaw detection. But the results of research conducted at MSTU named after. N. E. Bauman show that the metal of these pipes is characterized by the greatest anisotropy. To reduce the effect of anisotropy on defect detection, you should use a 2.5 MHz probe with a prism angle of 45°, and not 50°, as indicated in most regulatory documents. Most high accuracy control was achieved using a probe of the RSM-N12 type. Unlike the methodology compiled for pipes with Ø from 28 to 100 mm, there is no zone of uncertainty when monitoring these connections. The rest of the control method is similar. When using an RS-PET, it is also recommended to adjust the scanning speed and sensitivity for vertical drilling. The scanning speed and sensitivity of inclined combined probes should be adjusted using corner reflectors of the appropriate size.

When inspecting welds, it must be remembered that in the heat-affected zone there are metal delaminations, which make it difficult to determine the coordinates of the defect. The area in which the defect was found by an inclined probe must be additionally checked by a direct probe in order to clarify the nature of the defect and identify the exact value of the depth of the defect.

In the nuclear, petrochemical industry and nuclear energy Clad steels are often used in the manufacture of pipelines, apparatus and vessels. For cladding the inner wall of these structures, austenitic steels are used, which are applied by surfacing, rolling or explosion in a layer of 5 to 15 mm.

The process of monitoring these welded joints involves analyzing the continuity of the pearlite part of the weld, as well as the fusion zone with restorative anti-corrosion surfacing. In this case, the continuity of the body of the surfacing itself is not controlled.

But due to the difference in the acoustic characteristics of the base metal and austenitic steel, echo signals appear from the interface during ultrasonic testing, preventing the detection of defects, for example, cladding delaminations and sub-cladding cracks. In addition, the presence of cladding and its characteristics have a significant impact on the parameters of the acoustic path of the probe.

For this reason, standard technological solutions are ineffective in inspecting thick-walled welds of clad pipelines.

After many years of research, scientists have figured out the main features of the acoustic tract. Recommendations were received for optimizing its characteristics and a technology for performing ultrasonic analysis of welds with austenitic cladding was developed.

In particular, scientists have found that when a beam of ultrasonic waves is reflected from the boundary of pearlite-austenitic cladding, the radiation pattern almost does not change in the case of rolling cladding and changes significantly in the case of surfacing cladding. Its width increases significantly, and within the main lobe there are oscillations of 15-20 dB, depending on the surfacing method. There is a significant movement of the reflection exit point from the beam cladding boundary compared to its location, and the velocity of the shear waves in the transition zone also changes.

When developing technology for monitoring welded joints of clad pipelines, all this was taken into account. This technology provides for a preliminary mandatory determination of the thickness of the pearlite part (the depth of penetration of the anti-corrosion surfacing).

For more accurate detection of planar defects (lack of fusion and cracks), it is better to use a probe with an input angle of 45° and a frequency of 4 MHz. More accurate detection of vertically oriented defects at an input angle of 45°, in contrast to angles of 60 and 70°, is explained by the fact that during sounding of the latter, the angle at which the beam meets the defect is close to the third critical angle, at which the transverse wave reflection coefficient is minimal.
When the pipe is sounded outside at a frequency of 2 MHz, echo signals from defects are screened by an intense and long-lasting noise signal. The resistance to interference of the probe at a frequency of 4 MHz is on average 12 dB higher. For this reason, the useful signal from a defect located in close proximity to the deposit boundary will be better read against the background of noise. And vice versa, when sounding the pipe from the inside through the surfacing, better resistance to interference will be provided by a probe at a frequency of 2 MHz.

The technology for monitoring pipeline welds with surfacing is regulated by Gosatomnadzor document RFPNAEG-7-030-91.

). An expanded list of standards relating to ultrasound probes is given at the end of this page. Ultrasound probes can be conditionally classified according to the following criteria:

Based on the angle of vibration input, they are distinguished:

  • Direct transducers introduce and (or) receive vibrations normal to the surface of the test object at the input point.
  • Inclined transducers introduce and (or) receive vibrations in directions other than normal to the surface of the test object.

According to the method of placing the functions of emission and reception of the ultrasonic signal, they are distinguished:

  • Combined probes where the same piezoelectric element operates in both emission and reception modes.
  • Separate-combined converters where two or more piezoelements are placed in one housing, one of which operates only in the radiation mode, and the others in the reception mode.

By vibration frequency

  • High-frequency ultrasonic probes can be conditionally limited to the range of 4-5 MHz; this frequency is usually used when testing fine-grained workpieces of small thickness (usually less than 100 mm) and welded joints less than 20 mm thick.
  • Mid-frequency ultrasonic probes with a frequency range of 1.8-2.5 MHz. Converters with this frequency range are used to control products of greater thickness and larger particle sizes.
  • Low-frequency ultrasonic probes with a frequency range of 0.5-1.8 MHz are used to control workpieces with a coarse-grained structure and a high attenuation coefficient, such as cast iron, concrete or plastic.

By acoustic contact method

  • Contact probes where the working surface is in contact with the surface of the OC or is located from it at a distance of less than half the wavelength in the contact fluid.
  • Immersion ones, which operate when there is a layer of liquid between the surfaces of the transducer and the OC with a thickness greater than the spatial extent of the acoustic pulse.

According to the type of wave excited in the test object:

  • Longitudinal waves - vibrations of which occur along the axis of propagation;
  • Shear (transverse) waves - oscillations of which occur perpendicular to the propagation axis;
  • Surface waves (Relley waves) - propagating along the free (or lightly loaded) boundary of a solid body and quickly decaying with depth.
  • Normal ultrasonic waves (Lamb waves) are ultrasonic waves that propagate in plates and rods. There are symmetric and antisymmetric waves.
  • Head waves are a set of acoustic waves excited when a beam of longitudinal waves falls on the interface between 2 solid media at the first critical angle.

See also articles:

  • Converters for TOFD testing

Selection of ultrasonic piezoelectric transducer

The choice of transducer depends on the parameters of the controlled object, such as material, thickness, shape and orientation of defects, etc.

Selection of probe by input angle(straight or oblique) are chosen based on the sound pattern of a particular object. Sounding schemes are contained in state and departmental standards, as well as technological control charts. In the general case, the input angle is chosen in such a way as to ensure that the section under test is intersected by the acoustic axis of the transducer (direct or single-reflected beam). Detection of defects emerging on the surface is most effectively ensured when a transverse wave is incident at an angle of 45 ° ± 5 ° to this surface.

Selecting a probe according to the connection diagram(combined or PC) is selected depending on the thickness of the product or the distance of the control zone from the input surface. Direct combined probes are usually used when monitoring products with a thickness of more than 50 mm, and direct RS probes are used for monitoring products up to 50 mm thick inclusive, or a near-surface layer up to 50 mm.

Inclined RS probes are mainly used in a combined connection scheme. Inclined RS probes with a transverse wave are used primarily for testing welded joints of thin-walled (up to 9 mm) pipes with a diameter of no more than 400 mm (chord transducers). Inclined RS probes with a longitudinal wave are used to control joints with a coarse-grained structure and a high noise level (austenitic welds).

Selection of probe by oscillation frequency, is selected mainly based on the thickness of the OC and the required sensitivity of control. Due to their shorter wavelength, high-frequency transducers make it possible to find smaller defects, while the ultrasonic waves of low-frequency probes penetrate deeper into the material, because the attenuation coefficient decreases with frequency. Low-frequency probes are used for testing coarse-grained materials and materials with a high attenuation coefficient.

When choosing a frequency, it must be taken into account that increasing it causes:

  • near field increase
  • reduction of the dead zone associated with a decrease in the duration of free oscillations of the piezoelectric element;
  • improvement of beam and frontal resolution;
  • narrowing of the directional characteristics;
  • an increase in the attenuation coefficient and an associated decrease in sensitivity at large thicknesses
  • increase in the level of structural noise in coarse-grained materials; reduction in the level of intrinsic noise of the probe, associated with an increase in the attenuation of the sound wave in the elements of the probe with increasing frequency;


Subscribe to our channel You Tube

P111 - Direct combined converters

Converters type P111 used for flaw detection and thickness gauging of products using longitudinal waves. In practice, direct combined transducers are used to control sheets, plates, shafts, castings, forgings, as well as to search for local thinning in the walls of products. P111 transducers are used to detect volumetric and planar defects - pores, hairlines, delaminations, etc. The characteristics of P111 type probes are given in the table:

Designation of ultrasonic probe Effective frequency, MHz Reflector diameter, mm Working surface diameter, mm Overall dimensions, mm
P111-1.25-K20 1.25 ± 0.125 15 - 180 3,2 22 Ø 32x43
P111-2.5-K12 2.5 ± 0.25 10 - 180 1,6 14 Ø 22x35
P111-2.5-K20 2.5 ± 0.25 25 - 400 1,6 22 Ø 32x43
P111-5-K6 5.0 ± 0.5 5 - 70 1,2 9 Ø 19x32
P111-5-K12 5.0 ± 0.5 15 - 200 1,2 14 Ø 22x35
P111-5-K20 5.0 ± 0.5 15 - 200 1,2 22 Ø 32x43
P111-10-K6 10.0 ± 1.0 5 - 30 1,0 9 Ø 19x32

P112 - direct separate-combined converters

Contact separate-combined converters, type P112, are usually used to determine the residual wall thickness of products and to search for defects located at relatively small depths below the surface. The thickness of the controlled P 112 objects, as a rule, is in the range from 1 to 30 mm. The characteristics of P112 are given in the table:

Designation of ultrasonic probe Effective frequency, MHz Control range for steel 40x13, mm Reflector diameter, mm Working surface dimensions, mm Overall dimensions, mm
P112-2.5-12 2.5 ± 0.25 2 - 30 1,6 Ø 16 Ø 24 x 43
P112-5-6 5.0 ± 0.5 1 - 25 1,2 Ø 9 Ø 21 x 40
P112-5-12 5.0 ± 0.5 2 - 30 1,2 Ø 16 Ø 24 x 43
P112-5-3x4 5.0 ± 0.5 1 - 25 1,2 10 x 15 Ø 32 x 12 x 28

P121 inclined combined transducers

Slope transducers, type P121, are widely used in testing welded joints, sheets, stampings, forgings and other objects. P121 transducers allow you to detect cracks, volumetric defects, such as non-metallic inclusions, pores, lack of fusion, shrinkage cavities, etc. Using P121 type transducers, as a rule, the characteristics of vertically oriented defects are determined. The characteristics and possible markings of P 121 from one of the manufacturers are shown in the table:


Symbol Input angle according to the CO-2 model, degrees Control range for steel, mm Effective frequency, MHz Boom, mm PE size, mm Working surface size, mm Overall dimensions, mm
P121-1.8-40-M-002 40+-1,5 1…50 1,8+-0,18 9 8x10 24x12 33x16x25
P121-1.8-50-M-002 50+-1,5 1…50 1,8+-0,18 10 8x12 30x16 33x16x25
P121-1.8-65-M-002 65+-1,5 1…45 1,8+-0,18 12 8x12 32x16 33x16x24
P121-2.5-40-M-002 40+-1,5 0,7…50 2,5+-0,25 8 8x12 30x16 33x16x25
P121-2.5-45-M-002 45+-1,5 0,7…50 2,5+-0,25 8 8x12 30x16 33x16x25
P121-2.5-50-M-002 50+-1,5 0,7…50 2,5+-0,25 8 8x12 30x16 33x16x25
P121-2.5-65-M-002 65+-2 0,7…45 2,5+-0,25 10 8x12 32x16 33x16x25
P121-2.5-70-M-002 70+-2 0,7…35 5+-0,5 12 8x12 32x16 33x16x25
P121-5-40-M-002 40+-1,5 0,7…50 5+-0,5 5 5x5 20x16 20x16x16
P121-5-45-M-002 45+-1,5 0,7…50 5+-0,5 5 5x5 20x16 20x16x16
P121-5-50-M-002 50+-1,5 0,7…50 5+-0,5 5 5x5 20x16 20x16x16
P121-5-65-M-002 65+-2 0,7…40 5+-0,5 6 5x5 20x16 20x16x16
P121-5-70-M-002 70+-2 0,5…25 5+-0,5 7 5x5 20x16 20x16x16

P122 – inclined separate-combined transducers

Chord transducers type P122 mainly used for testing circumferential welds of pipe elements made of steel and polyethylene with a diameter of 14 to 219 mm. with a wall thickness from 2 to 6 mm., contact separate-combined chord transducers are used. The use of chord type transducers is especially effective for testing thin-walled welds from 2 to 4 mm.

P122 type transducers are designed for monitoring thin-walled welds, usually made of stainless steel, low-carbon steel and aluminum alloys Feature PEP – minimum dead zone and focusing of the ultrasonic field in a certain thickness range. The characteristics of P 121 are presented in the table:

Name Entry angle Arrow Y-axis focal length (depth) X-axis focal length Ultrasonic inspection of welds thickness
P122-5.0-65-M 65 o 7 mm 9 mm 13 mm 7 - 12 mm
P122-5.0-70-M 70 o 7 mm 5 mm 10 mm 5 - 9 mm
P122-5.0-75-M 75 o 7 mm 4 mm 9 mm 4 - 8 mm
P122-8.0-65-M 65 o 5 mm 6 mm 9 mm 5 - 7 mm
P122-8.0-70-M 70 o 5 mm 4 mm 8 mm 3 - 5 mm
P122-8.0-75-M 75 o 5 mm 3 mm 7 mm 2 - 4 mm

A number of standards have been introduced for industrial engineering communications, which require fairly stringent testing of connections. These techniques are being transferred to privately owned systems. The use of methods allows you to avoid emergency situations and carry out external and hidden installations with the required level of quality.

Incoming control

Incoming inspection of pipes is carried out for all types of materials, including metal-plastic, polyethylene and polypropylene after purchasing the products.

The standards mentioned involve testing pipes, regardless of the material from which they are made. Input controlling implies rules for checking the received batch. Inspection of welded joints is carried out as part of the acceptance of communications installation work. The described methods are mandatory for use by construction and installation organizations when delivering residential, commercial and industrial facilities with water supply and heating systems. Similar methods are used where quality control of pipes in industrial communications operating as part of equipment is necessary.

Sequence of implementation and methods

Acceptance of products after delivery is an important process, subsequently ensuring that there are no wasteful costs for replacing pipe products and no accidents. Both the quantity of products and their features are subject to careful verification. Quantitative verification allows you to take into account the entire consumption of products and avoid unnecessary costs associated with inflated standards and irrational use. The influence of the human factor should not be overlooked.

The work is carried out in accordance with section No. 9 of standard SP 42-101-96.

The sequence of input events is as follows:

  • Checking the certificate and marking compliance;
  • Random testing of samples is carried out if there is any doubt about the quality. The magnitude of the yield strength in tension and elongation during mechanical rupture is studied;
  • Even if there is no doubt about the supply, a small number of samples are selected for testing, within 0.25-2% of the batch, but not less than 5 pieces. When using products in coils, cut off 2 m;
  • The surface is inspected;
  • Inspected for swelling and cracks;
  • Measure typical dimensions of thicknesses and walls with a micrometer or caliper.

During an official inspection of a commercial or government organization A protocol is drawn up upon the completion of the procedure.

Non-destructive testing - features

Non-destructive methods are used in functioning utility systems. Particular attention is paid to the actual state of the metal and welded joints. Operational safety is determined by the quality of seam welding. During long-term operation, the degree of structural damage between connections is examined. They can be damaged by rust, which leads to thinning of the walls, and clogging of the cavity can lead to increased pressure and a pipeline rupture.

For these purposes, specialized equipment has been proposed - flaw detectors (for example, ultrasonic), which can be used to carry out work in private and commercial purposes.

In pipeline studies, pipe inspection methods are used:


By using this equipment The development of cracks or loss of integrity is monitored. Moreover, the main advantage is the identification of hidden defects. It is obvious that each of these methods shows high effectiveness on certain types of damage. The eddy current flaw detector is to some extent universal and cost-effective.

Ultrasonic inspection of pipes is more expensive and demanding, but it is very popular among specialists due to the established stereotype. Many plumbers use the capillary and magnetic particle method, which is applicable to all types of pipe products, including polyethylene and polypropylene. Testex is a popular tool among specialists for checking the tightness of welds.

Conclusion

Of the proposed methods of non-destructive testing, all 4 options are successfully used in practice, but do not have absolute universality. The pipe inspection system includes all types of flaw detectors for carrying out work. The ultrasonic method, as well as the technique based on eddy currents, has a certain degree of versatility. Moreover, the vortex version of the equipment is much cheaper.