Efficiency of equipment maintenance and repair. Development of a methodology for assessing the effectiveness of the functioning of the production and technical base of car service enterprises Denis Mikhailovich Lysanov. Notations and abbreviations
This article reflects measures to unite the efforts of disparate and independent functioning economic entities aimed at forming a single, holistic, production system in order to ensure rational maintenance of technical capacity. State of the art Agriculture determined food security country, providing the population with food and raw materials for the processing industry and largely depends on the degree of equipment of agriculture with means of production, their novelty, duration of use, and speed of renewal. Limited resources and an increase in the need for the final product produced in agriculture predetermine the processes of reproduction of technical potential in modern conditions. The article substantiates the need to use a set of technological, technical, financial and economic indicators that characterize the efficiency of the organization's production and economic activities. It is shown that statistical methods of multidimensional classification make it possible not only to minimize their number, but also to detect correlations for each indicator, which are the basis for improving the methodology for an integrated approach to assessing the performance of organizations.
material and technical base
machine and tractor park
fare
repair services
repair products
1. Vakhrushina M.A. Management analysis: choosing the optimal solution. – M.: Omega-L, 2005.
2. Vikhansky O.S. Strategic management. – 2nd ed., revised. and additional – M.: Gardariki, 2007. – 296 p.
3. Kudryashov V.I., Polunin S.V. Cooperation of peasant farms: problems, solutions, experience. – M.: State Unitary Enterprise Agroprogress, 2010. – 200 p.
4. Mkhitaryan Yu.I., Lagutin V.S. Improving business based on assessing and managing the quality of services. – M.: Interekoms, 2004. – 165 p.
5. Tikhonov V.A. Economics and organization of the use of technology in agriculture. – M.: Kolos, 2007. – 343 p.
6. Shatalova, T.N., Chebykina M.V. Resource potential of agricultural enterprises. – Orenburg, 2009. – 262 p.
7. Baskakova N.T. Conceptual approaches to choosing an option for the reproduction of agricultural machinery // Economic analysis: theory and practice. – 2009. – No. 8. – P. 29–38.
8. Baskakova N.T., Zhemchueva M.A., Kulikov S.V. Strategy for repairs and renovation of major production assets// Economic analysis: theory and practice. – 2008. – No. 2. – P. 16–36.
9 Website of the Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russia: http://www.minprom.gov.ru/activity/auto/return/1.
On modern stage development of agriculture, the repair and maintenance base should be considered as a single complex, problem solver maintaining and restoring the performance and serviceability of machinery and equipment for agricultural production. Its development and improvement occurs continuously in accordance with the development of the material and technical base of agriculture and its most active part - the machine and tractor fleet.
Maintenance and repair of the machine and tractor fleet developed in farms and districts of the Chelyabinsk region along the path of concentration and specialization; repair enterprises and workshops were created to restore parts, components, assemblies, engines, and repair grain harvesters and other combines.
Repair enterprises, divisions and services of the agro-industrial complex developed along the path of separating repair enterprises into an industry specializing in the repair of agricultural machinery. This direction of development met the requirements scientific and technological progress in repair production.
The components of the repair and maintenance base are material and technical means for repair purposes, technology and organization of production in repair enterprises.
The repair and maintenance base of farms includes specialized repair shops and agro-industrial complex plants, central repair shops, points Maintenance, car garages, machine yards, oil warehouses, mobile equipment for maintenance and repair of farm machinery.
The need of commodity producers for technical maintenance services, in our opinion, should have increased, since the tractor fleet had aged significantly (almost 80% of tractors and other machines were operating beyond their depreciation period by this time).
Taking into account the fact that the annual costs of repairing tractors are a manageable element, we carried out special studies, the analysis of the results of which allowed us to identify the following factors-conditions as the main ones for the regions of the Chelyabinsk region: the degree of supply of tractor machine operators, the amount of arable land per tractor, production area workshops on farms per tractor - m2, production area of a specialized repair and maintenance base of the agro-industrial complex per tractor - m2, production area of technical service workshops (maintenance points) per 1 tractor - m2 and determine the degree of influence of each specified condition with their combined impact on the specific indicator of annual costs for machine repairs.
The relationship between the annual costs per ruble of book value for repairs and maintenance of machines and the above conditions is described by the following linear equation:
where x1 is the supply of machine operators, people/tractor; x2 - amount of arable land per tractor, ha; x3 - production area of workshops on farms per tractor, m2; x4 - production area of a specialized repair and maintenance base for one tractor, m2; x5 - production area of workshops for maintenance points per tractor, m2.
In the above equation, the coefficients for the unknowns show how much the annual costs will increase (plus sign) and decrease (minus sign) per one ruble of the book value of the machines if the value of the variables increases by one accordingly (table).
Calculation of coefficients of influence of factors-conditions on the level of annual costs for tractor repairs in regions of the Chelyabinsk region
Odds |
||||||
From the analysis of the resulting equation, it follows, first of all, that the factors under consideration have different effects on the annual unit costs of maintaining machines in working condition (see table).
The capacity of the specialized workshops of the agro-industrial complex of the region in the above equation has a 1.6 times more positive impact on reducing the costs of repair and maintenance of machines than the central repair shops, and the workshops of the industrial industrial complex, respectively, have a more than 4 times more positive impact than the central repair shops of farms.
The statistical reliability of these dependencies indicates the need to take them into account in the formation and development of the repair base of the central repair shop and service station of farms and a specialized service base, as special factors that significantly influence the cost of repair actions.
These theoretical conclusions are confirmed not only by the practice of work at various levels of repair workshops of farms and specialized repair enterprises of the agro-industrial complex, but also by foreign experience.
In the territory of the former Federal Republic of Germany there are 5,723 specialized enterprises for the maintenance and repair of agricultural machinery. At the same time, in groups of farms with a production volume of 0.25-0.50 million euros, maintenance and repairs account for 86.6%, in groups of farms with 2-5 million euros, respectively - only 43.2%. The last large farms rely on the services of their repair shops.
The technical service system in the Republic of Korea is represented by dealer repair enterprises and their own enterprises (farmers). The share of dealers in the repair of tractors is 66.3%, and on the farm - 33.7%, respectively, for grain harvesters - 65.9 and 34.1%. In this case, the consumer is supplied with spare parts by dealerships.
An analysis of the work of technical workshops at various levels for servicing the machine and tractor fleet showed that they are an effective form of agricultural technical service and significantly reduce the costs of maintaining machines in working condition.
Method of determination economic efficiency performing maintenance and repair work on our own or in specialized enterprises, the agro-industrial complex was applied taking into account new principles of management in market conditions.
The main elements of novelty, along with the old ones, are: new criterion economic efficiency - increase in profit (reduction in production costs); determination of general (absolute) and comparative economic efficiency (new technologies with high efficiency compared to basic ones, for example, for repairs, do not receive approval if their use does not increase profits); The methods for calculating the costs of repairs and maintenance have been clarified (they include interest on loans, taxes, and insurance).
Previously, before determining the economic efficiency of repair and maintenance, a forecast calculation of the needs and demand of agricultural producers for various types of technical services was carried out, while it was stipulated that the volumes of individual complex work will be carried out by existing agro-industrial complex repair enterprises.
Economic justification A rational repair network involves establishing such sizes of repair plants and specialized workshops and their location in the region that should meet the demands of commodity producers at the lowest cost per unit of repair.
During the study, three options for a network of repair enterprises were calculated.
The first option is provided that the entire established volume of repairs of tractors and combines of commodity producers is carried out in the central workshops of former state farms.
The second option is that the established volume of current repairs is carried out in the workshops of former state farms, and capital repairs are carried out in currently existing factories with a capacity of 2 to 6 thousand conditional repairs.
The third option - the established volume of current repairs is carried out in the workshops of former state farms, and capital repairs are carried out at repair factories and workshops general purpose and workshops of service stations for energy-saturated tractors and workshops of car service stations located in agricultural areas of the region.
The calculations show that expanding the network of existing repair shops in the regions of the Chelyabinsk region, bringing technical services closer to the requirements of agricultural producers, specializing regional repair shops with repair plants will not only significantly reduce the cost of maintaining machines on farms, but will also make it possible to better use the production capacities of repair enterprises and central repair shops of former state farms.
When restoring scientifically based production volumes of agricultural products and with an appropriate machine and tractor fleet, taking into account the 3-fold increase in the number of commodity producers, it will be necessary to increase the capacity of workshops by 1.2-1.5 times through the construction of new ones and the reconstruction of old ones in newly organized farms (without farms) if repair specialization is not introduced.
Calculations show that with the current organization of machine repair only in farm workshops, the production capacity of 40.1 thousand conditional repairs will be required, and with the designed specialization - only 17.7 thousand conditional repairs. Consequently, when organizing a specialized network of repair enterprises (when converting a conventional repair unit into the production area it occupies, m2), less space will be required by 30 thousand m, or 21%, and capital investments - by 174,373 million rubles, or 82% less compared to the first option.
To comprehensively substantiate the economic efficiency of a specialized network of agro-industrial complex repair enterprises in comparison with farm workshops, it should be noted that in the conditions of the region, the removal of products from 1 m2 of area on average in service repair shops and in agro-industrial complex factories is 685 rubles, while in state farms - 261 rubles, productivity at repair enterprises of 1 worker is 33.6, and in repair shops - 11.7 thousand rubles, or less than 2.9 times, and capital productivity is correspondingly 2.6 times higher.
A specific reserve for reducing repair costs is reducing the cost of repair products. Calculations show that in the 3rd zone, which includes 6 districts of the Chelyabinsk region, occupying an area of 1848 thousand hectares, machine repairs account for only 14% of the total volume, the specific total costs of repairs are significantly higher than the average for the Chelyabinsk region.
As many years of experience and calculations show, specializing the repair of complex facilities at the district and zonal levels significantly reduces costs.
In general, in all zones of the region, as the analysis shows, with appropriate specialization repair work annual costs are reduced from 116,418 thousand rubles. up to 93966 thousand rubles, or by 19%.
To use existing production capacity Regional workshops of the agro-industrial complex require certain capital investments for the purchase of machines and equipment, of which fifty percent are completely worn out and require replacement.
Complex repairs of all equipment could be carried out at the seven existing repair plants in the Chelyabinsk region. The analysis shows that with an increase in the capacity of the enterprise to a certain size, the cost of a conventional unit of repair is reduced, but with an increase in capacity above these limits, transportation costs for the delivery of repair objects to the plant increase at a significant rate, which limits the growth of production of this enterprise.
Market business conditions require the creation competitive environment manufacturers of repair services, which significantly reduces selling prices and improves the quality of repair of machines, their components and assemblies. In modern conditions, the increase in existing agricultural industrial enterprises brings them closer to agricultural producers, allowing the latter to choose those that satisfy their needs and needs for technical services.
Of primary importance when choosing the most profitable and economical areas of specialization and concentration of repairs is reducing the cost of production, increasing the efficiency of capital investments, ensuring the greatest increase in the volume of repair products for each ruble of capital investments spent, and reducing their payback period.
Excessively large repair enterprises have a number of significant disadvantages compared to medium and small ones. These include: transportation over relatively long distances of repair facilities, spare parts, materials, causing an increase in transport costs; limited possibilities for uniform distribution of these enterprises throughout the agricultural areas of the region and a large distance between agricultural producers and service providers.
Reconstruction of regional agro-industrial complex workshops with their simpler equipment and organization, short terms re-equipment with a separate small number modern equipment and small existing fixed assets is completely economically justified and expedient.
The proposed specialization of the repair network, which includes specialized workshops, will free factories, as well as workshops of former farms, from the unusual functions of repairing many machines, components and assemblies, or restoring parts in small batches and will contribute to the specialization of large and small production.
It is shown that the specialization of repairs, the use of the existing extensive network of repair enterprises of the agro-industrial complex with the corresponding re-equipment of their equipment make it possible to bring the scope of technical services closer to the consumer, to most fully and efficiently satisfy in market conditions the diverse demand of commodity producers for technical services and ensure that they receive an economic effect.
In conclusion, it should be noted that the trend of expanding the production capacity of repair plants in the region, which has existed for many years, has a negative experience and does not contribute to increasing economic efficiency.
Reviewers:
Koledin S.V., Doctor of Economics, Professor, Head of the Department of Economics of Agro-Industrial Complex of the Chelyabinsk Branch of the National Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education "Chelyabinsk Institute of Economics and Law named after. M.V. Ladoshina", Chelyabinsk;
Pryakhin G.B., Doctor of Economics, Professor of the Department of Economics and Management of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education "Ural State University physical culture", Chelyabinsk.
The work was received by the editor on January 14, 2013.
Bibliographic link
Lysenko M.V., Lysenko Yu.V. METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING THE STATE OF TECHNICAL POTENTIAL AND THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ITS USE // Basic Research. – 2013. – No. 4-1. – P. 202-206;URL: http://fundamental-research.ru/ru/article/view?id=31128 (access date: 03/24/2020). We bring to your attention magazines published by the publishing house "Academy of Natural Sciences"
Whether or not this publication is taken into account in the RSCI. Some categories of publications (for example, articles in abstract, popular science, information journals) can be posted on the website platform, but are not taken into account in the RSCI. Also, articles in journals and collections excluded from the RSCI for violation of scientific and publishing ethics are not taken into account."> Included in the RSCI ®: no | The number of citations of this publication from publications included in the RSCI. The publication itself may not be included in the RSCI. For collections of articles and books indexed in the RSCI at the level of individual chapters, the total number of citations of all articles (chapters) and the collection (book) as a whole is indicated."> Citations in the RSCI ®: 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Whether or not this publication is included in the core of the RSCI. The RSCI core includes all articles published in journals indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus or Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI) databases."> Included in the RSCI core: No | The number of citations of this publication from publications included in the RSCI core. The publication itself may not be included in the core of the RSCI. For collections of articles and books indexed in the RSCI at the level of individual chapters, the total number of citations of all articles (chapters) and the collection (book) as a whole is indicated."> Citations from the RSCI ® core: 0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal-normalized citation rate is calculated by dividing the number of citations received by a given article by the average number of citations received by articles of the same type in the same journal published in the same year. Shows how much the level of this article is above or below the average level of articles in the journal in which it was published. Calculated if the RSCI for a journal has a complete set of issues for a given year. For articles of the current year, the indicator is not calculated."> Normal citation rate for the journal: | Five-year impact factor of the journal in which the article was published, for 2018."> Impact factor of the journal in the RSCI: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Citation normalized by subject area is calculated by dividing the number of citations received by a given publication by the average number of citations received by publications of the same type in the same subject area published in the same year. Shows how much the level of a given publication is higher or lower than the average level of other publications in the same field of science. For publications of the current year, the indicator is not calculated."> Normal citations by area: |
4 Basic provisions4.1 The Federal Law "On Technical Regulation" defines the safety of products, production processes, operation, storage, transportation, sales and disposal as a state in which there is no unacceptable risk associated with causing harm to the life or health of citizens, property of individuals or legal entities, state or municipal property, the environment, life or health of animals and plants. 4.2 During the operation of power plant equipment, a change in its technical condition occurs, which determines a decrease in reliability, efficiency of use and the likelihood of deterioration in industrial, environmental and other types of safety. Restoring the quality of equipment is carried out within the framework of the system of maintenance and repair of power plant equipment. 4.3 Monitoring and assessing the quality of repairs are prerequisite ensuring the required level of quality of repaired power plant equipment. 4.4 This standard has developed a methodology for assessing the quality of repairs for various types power plant equipment, which is based on a unified methodology, according to which the methodology for assessing the quality of repairs of a specific type (type) of power plant equipment includes two components: 4.5 The main regulatory documents establishing the quality indicators of repaired equipment and the requirements of regulatory and technical documentation for repairs to components, assemblies, parts and equipment as a whole during the repair process are the standards of the organization of the group “Technical conditions for major repairs. Norms and requirements” (hereinafter - technical conditions for major repairs) corresponding to the type and type of power plant equipment. 4.6 When accepting equipment from repair, an assessment of the quality of repair must be carried out, containing: 5 General requirements for assessing the quality of repairs5.1 Assessing the quality of repaired equipment5.1.1 Assessment of the quality of repaired equipment characterizes the technical condition of the equipment after repair and its compliance with the requirements of regulatory and technical documentation. 5.1.2 The rating “complies with the requirements of the normative and technical documentation” is established if all defects identified as a result of inspection of equipment components have been eliminated; NTD requirements defining the quality of equipment have been met; acceptance tests showed that the start-up, loading and operation of the equipment in different modes comply with the requirements of the operating standards (instructions); the quality indicators of the repaired equipment are at the standard level. 5.1.3 The rating “complies with the requirements of the normative and technical documentation with restrictions” is established if: 5.1.4 Equipment repaired with the rating “complies with the requirements of the normative and technical documentation with restrictions” is allowed for operation with a limited period of further use, and an action plan must be developed to eliminate the identified deficiencies and a deadline for its implementation must be established. 5.1.5 If during the period of controlled operation it is determined that defects have arisen on the equipment that can lead to emergency consequences, or the operation of the equipment in any modes is characterized by a deviation from the permissible parameters and further operation is impossible, and the elimination of defects requires removal for repair five or more days, then the equipment must be taken out of service and a rating of “does not meet the requirements of the technical and technical documentation” is assigned to it. After repairs are carried out to eliminate defects, the equipment is re-accepted from repair, supervised operation is carried out, and a new quality assessment is established for the repaired equipment. 5.1.6 A quality rating is established for each type of repaired equipment. 5.2 Assessment of the quality of repair work performed5.2.1 Assessment of the quality of repair work performed characterizes the organizational and technical activities of each of the organizations involved in the repair. 5.2.2 An assessment of the quality of repair work performed is established for each organization within the scope of equipment repairs performed by it, taking into account the fulfillment by this organization of basic and additional requirements. 5.2.3 An “excellent” rating is established when all basic and additional requirements are met. 5.2.4 Repaired equipment may have a quality assessment - “complies with the requirements of the normative and technical documentation with restrictions” for the following reasons not related to the quality of the activities of repair organizations: 5.3 Procedure for assessing the quality of repairs5.3.1 The quality of equipment repair is assessed during the repair process and upon acceptance of equipment from repair. 5.3.2 The order and procedure for monitoring and assessing the quality of repaired equipment and the quality of repair work performed is presented in Table 1.
5.3.3 The schematic diagram of quality assessment is shown in Figure 1. Figure 1 - Schematic diagram for assessing the quality of repairsPicture 1 - Schematic diagram repair quality assessment 6 General requirements for methods for assessing the quality of repairs of power plant equipment6.1 The methodology for assessing the quality of repairs for various types (types) of power plant equipment is based on a unified methodology, according to which assessment of the quality of repairs of a specific type (type) of power plant equipment includes two components: |